Originally Posted by M54ccibo
Yeah, the numbers are good relative to my own pulls
All the runs have standard correction applied. I'm no dyno expert, but I am sure once Tom and Steve start analyzing the data (what is used for turbocharged engines I am sure is different than NA) a clear pattern will likely emerge. And, going out on a limb, is that these cars are grossly under rated.
All said I am happy that whp increased with the new pipes. And that, is a good thing!
Yes you are correct on all points, std correction (SAE is more real world I guess) and grossly underrated our cars are!!!!!
I think I was M5 number four for them so they are building a nice list. Now Im looking for a tune to get us a little more ummmph in the lower rpm range. I love that we peak after 5500 rpm but we dont always live in that range in daily driving especially around town.