View Single Post
      09-10-2010, 07:14 AM   #24
auggiem3
Captain
auggiem3's Avatar
United_States
295
Rep
939
Posts

Drives: F87 M2C & E92 M3
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington, DC

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyd1961 View Post
sorry but im disapointed. doesnt look mean enough. and i dont understand why they dont upgrade the performance? the car should be a 3.7 second car and 7:55 nurburgring. to stick up ctsv butt. il stick with my M3 sedan
The ring time is reasonable given a 585 to 600 bhp expected power production and the historical ability for the engineers at m to produce significant lap improvements generation after generation. Since the e60 ran an 8:13, I think advancements will yield a sub-8:00 ring run. However, 3.7 0-60? That seems a bit aggressive given that the e60 did it in 4.7 and an all out M3 hits 4.5.

IMO, BMW understands the importance of straight line oomph, without fixating on the numerical output. The M cars consistently win competitions against peers (especially early in their production runs) without matching horsepower or 0-60 ratings. Think about the RS6 at 450 when the e39 made 394 and the E63 AMG at 515+ when the e60 posted 500.

I would be more interested in the 7:55 ring run than a sub 4.5 0-60 time.
Appreciate 0