M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > Wheels | Tires | Suspension | Brakes | Chassis

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-22-2012, 09:31 PM   #1
Bmill
E39, E60 and now F10
 
Bmill's Avatar
 
Drives: F10 M5 Thriple Black
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota

Posts: 130
iTrader: (0)

M5 Carbon Ceramic Brakes for Minnesota? Thoughts?

So as I get ready to place my order this week what do you guys think a about carbon brakes seeing I live in Minnesota?

How will they be in the cold winter? Remember minus 20 F happens a few time each winter. Except this year.

How about the sand and salt they add to the roads?

Lastly what would a brake job cost iv it is ever needed?

Thanks
Bmill is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 09:09 AM   #2
AlpWhite11
Captain
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Irvine

Posts: 695
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via Yahoo to AlpWhite11
Should hold up same in cold weather as in warmer weather. They were on m5 prototypes for extreme winter testing. Salt won't affect ceramic any more than steel and maybe even less since ceramic won't rust.

Brake job shouldn't cost any more than steel brakes since it should be the same and amount type of labor, just more expensive replacement parts.

What color m5 are you getting? Can't wait to see gold brakes on the M5. I think it looks great on the M6
AlpWhite11 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 09:36 AM   #3
lawpurv99
das biest
 
Drives: 2013 F10 M5
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: North Carolina

Posts: 130
iTrader: (0)

Any thoughts on how much the ceramic brake option will go for? I'm just curious if this will be a couple k's or not and if it's worth it. I'm definitely planning on going all in since we'll already be around the 100k mark, so why hold back for another few?

Also, gold brakes? Are the ceramics gold instead of the blue? Any pics? That could be a really hot combo with the Imperial Blue Metallic!
lawpurv99 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 10:01 AM   #4
Jason
Administrator
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

Posts: 16,438
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawpurv99 View Post
Any thoughts on how much the ceramic brake option will go for? I'm just curious if this will be a couple k's or not and if it's worth it. I'm definitely planning on going all in since we'll already be around the 100k mark, so why hold back for another few?

Also, gold brakes? Are the ceramics gold instead of the blue? Any pics? That could be a really hot combo with the Imperial Blue Metallic!
Here's some detailed information on the carbon ceramic brakes:
http://www.6post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=647467

Photos of gold ceramic brakes:
http://www.6post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=658193
http://www.6post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=671798

No one knows yet how much ceramic brakes option will be for the US market because the options / ordering guides have not yet been released (will be sometime this week).
__________________
Check on the Latest BMW News
Become a fan of Bimmerpost Facebook
Follow us on Bimmerpost Twitter
Subscribe to Bimmerpost Youtube Channel

Jason is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 10:46 AM   #5
JC919
Lieutenant Colonel
 
JC919's Avatar
 
Drives: CSL
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Posts: 1,792
iTrader: (0)

I just can't help, but think that ceramics are overkill on an M5, especially when it comes time to replace the rotors.
__________________

2003 CSL, SG and some brake bs
2002 M5, SSII/Blk and bone stock. Stored in TX
2008 M3, AW/Blk 6MT, Akrapovic Evolution, Evosport Pulley, ESS Tune, Michelin PSS/Hoosier, other track stuff SOLD
JC919 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 12:27 PM   #6
Bmill
E39, E60 and now F10
 
Bmill's Avatar
 
Drives: F10 M5 Thriple Black
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota

Posts: 130
iTrader: (0)

Great discussion, keep it going. Tank you for pointing out the other thread.I was invited last year to attend the Indy M5 event. Having dinner with the lead M5 engineer his view was the carbon brakes were more of a marketing dept. request than a need for 90% on the M5 owners. His comments were when cold the steel brakes are actually better and the carbon brakes shine the hotter and harder the use.

So I have bought into the BMW marketing machine but for that "cold" comment that stick's in my head. I know he was talking about brake temp and not outside temp but just wondering if there is a relation.

On one hand I have no need for C.C. brakes on the other hand I need these C.C.brakes.
Bmill is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 02:08 PM   #7
lawpurv99
das biest
 
Drives: 2013 F10 M5
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: North Carolina

Posts: 130
iTrader: (0)

http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=681025

Any thoughts after reading the issues this guy is having in Slovakia?
lawpurv99 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 05:31 PM   #8
AlpWhite11
Captain
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Irvine

Posts: 695
iTrader: (0)

Send a message via Yahoo to AlpWhite11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmill
Great discussion, keep it going. Tank you for pointing out the other thread.I was invited last year to attend the Indy M5 event. Having dinner with the lead M5 engineer his view was the carbon brakes were more of a marketing dept. request than a need for 90% on the M5 owners. His comments were when cold the steel brakes are actually better and the carbon brakes shine the hotter and harder the use.

So I have bought into the BMW marketing machine but for that "cold" comment that stick's in my head. I know he was talking about brake temp and not outside temp but just wondering if there is a relation.

On one hand I have no need for C.C. brakes on the other hand I need these C.C.brakes.
Well the colder it is out the cooler your brakes will generally run and cool down so based on what the engineer is saying steel probably gives you better performance in your really cold winters. Do you like the looks of the gold brakes more or the 'potential' performance from the ceramic brakes? Or maybe just the bragging rights . I know I'd enjoy that if I could afford it easily.
AlpWhite11 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-23-2012, 11:27 PM   #9
stealth.pilot
Knight Commander ///
 
stealth.pilot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 M5 Individual
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: South East USA

Posts: 4,674
iTrader: (0)

When I attended the Seville M5 experience, I asked one of the M5 engineers which brakes he would pick. He said the steel brakes were better in most driving situations. He said the carbon brakes only have an advantage in extreme track driving situations, but in most driving conditions, the steel brakes had better braking power. He also said that these ceramic brakes were more of a marketing request.
__________________
2014 ///M5 Individual Frozen Grey, Silverstone Full Merino, Piano Black, Exec Pkg, Drivers assistance plus, LED Pkg, Bang and Olufsen, 20" 343M Forged Alloy Wheels
Countermeasures: Bel StiR+, Laser Interceptor Quad HP, Zaon MRX
Upgrades: Eisenmann Sport with M Performance Carbon tips, Dinan anti-roll bars
stealth.pilot is online now   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      04-24-2012, 04:33 PM   #10
Philippe4
New Member
 
Drives: 1998 540i 6sp/ 2006 750i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta

Posts: 12
iTrader: (0)

Love this site! I am a noobie! I was wondering if someone could sum up the differences between Carbon ceramic brakes and the steel. I understand that in all but extreme conditions the engineers prefer the steel. But do the ceramic brakes last the lifetime of the car? That could be a consideration if a brake job is >$1500 because you need new rotors. Is the feel any different? I assume that better means stops better and feels better.
Philippe4 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-24-2012, 05:28 PM   #11
ALPINE6SPD
Lieutenant General
 
ALPINE6SPD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 BMW 328i Sport
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Highland Lakes NJ

Posts: 10,414
iTrader: (2)

Send a message via AIM to ALPINE6SPD
This option will cost at least 5000-7000 im sure. Maybe more. It is a bit of overkill for street use.
__________________
2010 AW e90 328i: 6 speed, Black Leather, Dark Wood trim, ZPP, ZCW, ZVP,ZSP, Nav, Xenon
BMW Performance CF Rear spolier and Gloss black grills
2008 Candy White MKV GTI 2.0T 6 Speed Manul Gone
2008 AW X3 3.0si: 6 speed Returned
2006 AW e90 330i: 6 speed Dinan Stage 1 Returned
ALPINE6SPD is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-25-2012, 10:13 AM   #12
jphughan
Brigadier General
 
jphughan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011.75 M3 E92 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX

Posts: 3,290
iTrader: (0)

OP what's driving you toward carbon ceramic brakes? The ONLY reasons to go carbon ceramic are:

1. You want to change your rotors and pads a lot less.
2. You hate brake dust.
3. You go to the track a LOT and would experience brake fade with the stock brakes.
4. You're such a great driver that the weight reduction makes a difference.

Notice one thing that's not on that list? "You want shorter braking distance." Why not? Because until you fade your brakes (which would only happen on the track), the limiting factor in braking distance is TIRES, not brakes; think about it, stock brakes are perfectly capable of locking up the wheels, otherwise ABS wouldn't be necessary. I snicker when people say they went carbon ceramic so they can stop on a dime, not realizing that they'd have the exact same stopping distance with steel brakes. These people are delusional.

If #3 and #4 don't apply to you because you won't be tracking, then make sure #1 and #2 are worth $5-8K to you, because that seems to be the upgrade cost from other manufacturers. As for replacement cost, I believe Porsche's carbon ceramic rotors are $5K -- each. Now they tend to last 60-80K miles or more, but that's still far more expensive than the extra sets of steel rotors you'd need in that amount of time.

Also bear in mind that carbon ceramic rotors are VERY sensitive; if they get even slightly chipped by a piece of road debris, they have to be replaced -- and the other side might need to be replaced as well to maintain proper balance across the axle. That's why some people, even those who DO go to the track, prefer steel brakes and go with big brake kits to deal with fade; it sucks to have to pay $8K-16K to replace a rotor or two just because you went off-track and kicked up a small rock or something. Check out Porsche forums and you'll see how many people have switched from PCCB to steel for that reason. Another major hazard is taking the wheels off; if you nick the rotor when removing the wheel, time for a new rotor or two!
__________________
11 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT | Premium 2 | Convenience | 19" | EDC | Prem Audio | Moonroof | BMW Apps | Vorshlag Adjustable Camber Plates | StopTech ST-60 380mm BBK | Castrol SRF Fluid | ModMyNav.com rear camera | OEM Euro Sunglasses Holder

Last edited by jphughan; 04-26-2012 at 10:05 AM.
jphughan is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      04-26-2012, 10:32 PM   #13
Philippe4
New Member
 
Drives: 1998 540i 6sp/ 2006 750i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Atlanta

Posts: 12
iTrader: (0)

That sounds like very good advice. I hate brake dust though http://f10.m5post.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif
Philippe4 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      04-27-2012, 09:56 AM   #14
SleepTight
Second Lieutenant
 
SleepTight's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 BMW M5
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Long Island, New York

Posts: 287
iTrader: (0)

IMHO, carbon ceramic brakes are a pure vanity purchase on a street car. They will not give you shorter stopping distances and are not necessary to avoid fade under anything resembling normal street use. If you track your car once a week then maybe ceramics make sense, but I refuse to believe that anybody who buys an M5 (as opposed to an M3 or even a 911) is going to track their car more than a couple of times a year. Yeah, brake dust is a pain, but the $8,700 (U.S.) the carbon ceramics will cost you buys an awful lot of professional hand detailing sessions.

As for weight savings, the difference between carbon ceramic and steel brakes is pretty slight and is likely offset on the M5 by the need to equip the car with the larger and presumably heavier 20' wheels in order to accommodate the carbon ceramic brakes.

Thanks, but I'll pass.
SleepTight is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      05-06-2012, 08:59 PM   #15
StaufferMitch
Registered
 
Drives: 2008 M3 coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago

Posts: 1
iTrader: (0)

I'm pulling together the specs for my F10 order and note that the ceramic brakes are only compatible with the 20" wheels. Assuming you need winter wheels in Minneapolis, you'll want to make sure that snow tires are available for the 20" wheels should you go the ceramic route.
StaufferMitch is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 PM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST