How the hell! 2013 Audi S7 12.4 1/4 mile - M5POST

Keik E92 M3 · 06-04-2012, 01:05 AM

This is amazing to me, with only 420hp!

Quote:

Displacement: 240 cu in, 3933 cc
Power: 420 hp @ 6400 rpm
Torque: 406 lb-ft @ 1400 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manual shifting mode

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 114.7 in
Length: 196.1 in
Width: 75.2 in Height: 55.4 in
Curb weight (C/D est): 4350 lb

PERFORMANCE (C/D EST):
Zero to 60 mph: 4.0 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.4 sec
Top speed: 155 mph

FUEL ECONOMY (C/D EST):
EPA city/highway driving: 16/26 mpg

MediaArtist · 06-04-2012, 01:14 AM

AWD/DCT

kyleb350 · 06-04-2012, 02:04 AM

and 406 ft lbs doesn't hurt either.

Soorena · 06-04-2012, 03:56 AM

I've heard these TT V8's are seriously underrated.

Jack_Vang · 06-04-2012, 06:44 AM

Damn...

Sedoy · 06-04-2012, 10:38 AM

Definitely underrated, S6 did even better - 1/4 mile 12.1 sec, F10 M5 did 11.9 sec in the same review. Pretty impressive for $71K (base price) S6 as well as 4255 lbs. for V8TT + AWD with 17/26 EPA MPG.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...-e63-amg-1.pdf

MisterSkiMask · 06-04-2012, 10:48 AM

Wait, so in this thread do we trust American magazine numbers?

wisesoul · 06-04-2012, 11:09 AM

Doubt those numbers are accurate. TT-RS clocked a 3.5 0-60 one time, but was really low 4s when others tested it. Audi can easily increase the boost on their turbo engines for the press. I'm going to wait for more results

Inspired · 06-04-2012, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wisesoul

Doubt those numbers are accurate. TT-RS clocked a 3.5 0-60 one time, but was really low 4s when others tested it. Audi can easily increase the boost on their turbo engines for the press. I'm going to wait for more results

Conditions, driver, launch.

TSM330i · 06-04-2012, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wisesoul

Doubt those numbers are accurate. TT-RS clocked a 3.5 0-60 one time, but was really low 4s when others tested it. Audi can easily increase the boost on their turbo engines for the press. I'm going to wait for more results

I thought that was with the DCT that did 3.5 0-60. The low 4s was with a manual trans that we are getting.

Bingobimmer · 06-04-2012, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sedoy

Definitely underrated, S6 did even better - 1/4 mile 12.1 sec, F10 M5 did 11.9 sec in the same review. Pretty impressive for $71K (base price) S6 as well as 4255 lbs. for V8TT + AWD with 17/26 EPA MPG.

http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...-e63-amg-1.pdf

Very interesting...

Kyokio · 06-05-2012, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSM330i

I thought that was with the DCT that did 3.5 0-60. The low 4s was with a manual trans that we are getting.

that's correct

mike@Vossen · 06-19-2012, 03:22 PM

Car is a beast!!

MikeyV · 06-20-2012, 02:26 AM

This is just the S6/S7 just imagine what a beast the RS6/RS7 will be. The M5 won't know which way it went.

pkim1079 · 06-22-2012, 07:38 PM

it may have a great dig but what's it look like passed the quarter mile. and you gotta expect some heavy ass understeer with the quattro.

pkim1079 · 06-22-2012, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeyV

This is just the S6/S7 just imagine what a beast the RS6/RS7 will be. The M5 won't know which way it went.

the m5 would still run laps around it.

keanu1 · 06-28-2012, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkim1079

the m5 would still run laps around it.

bmw is getting softer with every F code generation!!
it's a matter of time untill audi will top bmw in every category!
I''ve seen manny reviews saying a8>7, a6>5, q3>x1, a3 i''m sure will be better than 1 series

i really hope i am wrong but....

pkim1079 · 06-28-2012, 06:08 PM

f10 m5 doing a 0-60 in less than 3.7 seconds and the 1/4mi in 11.9? thats better than a panamera turbo. and rwd handling? audi can't compete with that.

fwiw, the genesis rspec is quicker than the panamera S. lol

Hurricane · 06-28-2012, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSM330i

I thought that was with the DCT that did 3.5 0-60. The low 4s was with a manual trans that we are getting.

Agreed.

mdosu · 07-15-2012, 11:49 PM

pretty consistent numbers Audi S6 had similar figures. The car will run out of breath in a 1 mile high speed run.

As others have said, AWD and DCT does wonders for a standing start...

DSC_OFF · 07-16-2012, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurricane

Agreed.

+1

06-04-2012, 01:14 AM	#2
MediaArtist There is No Substitute Drives: Audi A6, 997 GT3 RS, E90 335i Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Mission Viejo, CA Posts: 677 iTrader: (0)	AWD/DCT __________________ '13 Audi A6 '07 Porsche GT3 RS '08 BMW E90 335i

06-04-2012, 11:09 AM	#8
wisesoul Savoir Faire Drives: 2013 BMW M5 Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 1,121 iTrader: (0)	Doubt those numbers are accurate. TT-RS clocked a 3.5 0-60 one time, but was really low 4s when others tested it. Audi can easily increase the boost on their turbo engines for the press. I'm going to wait for more results __________________ Current: AW/SO F10 M5 Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3, MTM 10mm spacers, Hotchkis rear sway bar, APR Stage 1, Milltek Catless, RNS-E, Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel Sold:E46 323i

06-22-2012, 07:38 PM	#15
pkim1079 Major Drives: e90 ///M3 ZCP + e82 135i DCT Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lost angeles Posts: 1,482 iTrader: (0)	it may have a great dig but what's it look like passed the quarter mile. and you gotta expect some heavy ass understeer with the quattro. __________________ 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.3 shift! (repeat!!) who needs software when you can tune the DRIVER?

06-28-2012, 06:08 PM	#18
pkim1079 Major Drives: e90 ///M3 ZCP + e82 135i DCT Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lost angeles Posts: 1,482 iTrader: (0)	f10 m5 doing a 0-60 in less than 3.7 seconds and the 1/4mi in 11.9? thats better than a panamera turbo. and rwd handling? audi can't compete with that. fwiw, the genesis rspec is quicker than the panamera S. lol __________________ 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.3 shift! (repeat!!) who needs software when you can tune the DRIVER?

07-15-2012, 11:49 PM	#20
mdosu Help! Can't decide btw MW & AW, 1st world problems Drives: 2008.99989 SSII E90 "Civic" Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Northern Virginia Posts: 5,886 iTrader: (4)	pretty consistent numbers Audi S6 had similar figures. The car will run out of breath in a 1 mile high speed run. As others have said, AWD and DCT does wonders for a standing start... __________________ Yes, that's a xmas tree in my trunk

06-04-2012, 02:04 AM	#3
kyleb350 Brigadier General Drives: '13 ST Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: LoMbard, IL Posts: 3,912 iTrader: (6)	and 406 ft lbs doesn't hurt either.

06-04-2012, 03:56 AM	#4
Soorena First Lieutenant Drives: XJ, M3, 458 Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Paris Posts: 379 iTrader: (0)	I've heard these TT V8's are seriously underrated.

06-04-2012, 06:44 AM	#5
Jack_Vang Private Drives: 2008 335i Coupe Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Lawrenceville/Atlanta Posts: 78 iTrader: (5)	Damn...

06-04-2012, 10:38 AM	#6
Sedoy Private First Class Drives: E53 X5 Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: New England Posts: 122 iTrader: (0)	Definitely underrated, S6 did even better - 1/4 mile 12.1 sec, F10 M5 did 11.9 sec in the same review. Pretty impressive for $71K (base price) S6 as well as 4255 lbs. for V8TT + AWD with 17/26 EPA MPG. http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...-e63-amg-1.pdf

06-04-2012, 10:48 AM	#7
MisterSkiMask Lieutenant Colonel Drives: I Can not say Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: you must not know Posts: 1,819 iTrader: (0)	Wait, so in this thread do we trust American magazine numbers?

06-19-2012, 03:22 PM	#13
mike@Vossen Drives: BMW Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Miami \| Atlanta Posts: 477 iTrader: (0)	Car is a beast!!

06-20-2012, 02:26 AM	#14
MikeyV Lieutenant Drives: Volvo V70, MINI Cooper Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Norway Posts: 580 iTrader: (0)	This is just the S6/S7 just imagine what a beast the RS6/RS7 will be. The M5 won't know which way it went.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search