FORUMS
- 5
|
||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| 02-24-2013, 07:38 PM | #89 | |
|
FROZEN SILVER
Drives: '13 F10 M5 '12 E92 M3 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
1. Based on my experience with the e60 M5, four years and 50k miles, it was most reliable car I ever had or at least reliable as most Honda cars I had before and by far the most reliable M with my current e92 M3...and YES I said the most...in those 50K miles I only had to oil changes and the spark plugs as a maintenance item...again that was my experience. On the other hand my beloved and M fixation e39 M5 was a money pit but it was a more complete car than e60 M5. The F10 M5 is the most complete M5 to date in all aspects of car, and more of what I expect from an M5 to be in comparison with the e60 M5. 2. And regarding oil and fuel consumption, it is what it is all M cars and high performances cars I have owned consumed good quantities both...not sure I would consider that a bad thing myself...But we all know...there is no free lunch, you pay to play... ..F10 M5 = "Luxury Long Range Jetliner" E60 M5 = "Regional Jet"
__________________
CURRENT RIDES - 13 MCB F10 M5 6MT / 12 FROZEN SILVER E92 M3 DCT / 03 GPW S2K AP1
PREVIOUS M CARS - 02 E39 M5 / 06 E60 M5 |
|
|
|
|
| 02-24-2013, 10:21 PM | #90 | |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() Drives: F10 M5 imperial blue Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.
Posts: 289
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
it seems to me the design philosophy just did a 180 with the f10 m5... the delay, albeit slight, in throttle response, mutted exhaust, artificial steering settings, lower rpm redline, and less brutal, more refined transmission, all seem to make the car feel less "connected" to the driver. obviously the f10 is quicker to 60, and 1/4 mile. but they took away all the things that gave the car "soul" to accomplish this. this is what bugs me. i love the improved luxury and updated design of the car. but these things go without saying, you "expect" these things. i just i dont see why they had to make the car bigger/heavier to acomplish this. Btw, i dont know how many of you have checked out the new 991 carrera s, but i have yet to hear one negative comment on the exhaust, engine, handling, or anything for that matter. they took the existing 911, made it about 90 lbs "lighter", faster, and "kept" the things that made it great, actually they enhanced them. i think in this respect they stayed true to the philosophy of porsche, much more than ///M did to theirs. no, i dont expect an m5 to lose 1000 lbs and become a 911, but it just seems BMW went completely in the opposite direction altogether. Last edited by mainly; 02-24-2013 at 10:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
| 02-24-2013, 11:46 PM | #91 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: Triple Black 2013 F10 M5 Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sunny San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,361
iTrader: (0)
|
For all you WWII buffs out there:
E60 M5 = Pzkpfw VI Tiger I Tank F10 M5 = Pzkpfw V Panther Tank While the Tiger I was feared by many of its opponents, it was over-engineered, used expensive and labour intensive materials and production methods, and was time-consuming to produce. Only 1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944. The Tiger was prone to certain types of track failures and immobilizations, and limited in range by its huge fuel consumption. It was, however, generally mechanically reliable but expensive to maintain. It had the best tank gun of the entire war, the 88, which was essentially the same 88 anti-aircraft gun that could take out a tank from almost 15,000 meters. Doesn't this sound like another German vehicle that has a V10?! Lol! ---------------------------- The Panther Tank had better frontal armor (including the benefit of a sloping angle, increasing effective armor depth), better gun penetration, was lighter and thus faster, and could handle rough terrain better than the Tigers. The tradeoff was weaker side armor. The Panther proved to be deadly in open country and shooting from long range, but vulnerable to close-quarters combat. The F10 is a much more advanced design with sloping frontal armor to withstand fire from GTR's. Haha! :P In the end though, both tanks proved to be extremely deadly weapons that outclassed their Allied and Soviet counterparts throughout the war. The same is still true with both M5's. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| 02-25-2013, 08:14 AM | #92 | |||
|
Major
![]() |
Quote:
Having said that, if you told me to pick between a 997 and 993, I'd go with a 997, just like I'd go with an F10 (if money was no object). But you see my point here I hope. Quote:
Quote:
That's the problem. People want more comfortable, spacious, insulated (road noise + windnoise). Those are completely relevant on a regular F10. The same cannot be said about the 911. And that's why there are going to be smaller cars available as the lineup changes.
__________________
2008 E92 M3: Sparkling Graphite | Bamboo Beige | 6MT | CF Roof | OEM ZCP Wheels | Fully Catless Borla S-Type | BPM Stage II Tune & Coding | RS Technik Spacers (12F/12R)
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
| 02-25-2013, 10:01 AM | #93 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
I would like to know how many M5 owners actually track their cars? I wanted a fast luxury car, and being my 6th BMW this was the best option. I love the car, and wouldn't change a thing except time to drive it more(:
Not sure I would want some loud car driving down the street drawing attention to myself. Now that's why it would be nice to have a 911, or lambo parked in the garage which is next years toy pending the economy. I see most of the comments on M5's don't even own the car nor have driven the darn thing? All the owners I have met love the car, and forums are opinions I understand, but try to have an opinion your informed about. Price point was not an object for me, and I do believe for me this was the best all around performer with good looks! Just my two cents, and too many haters(: |
|
|
|
| 02-25-2013, 03:29 PM | #94 | ||
|
Enlisted Member
![]() |
Quote:
The BMW M5 is a high performance, luxury sedan. The M5 has always had "sports car like" performance but it has never been a sports car. A sports car being defined as a production car designed for speed, high acceleration, and maneuverability, having a low body and usually adequate seating for only two persons; a small, usually two seat, two door automobile designed for spirited performance and nimble handling. Sports cars may be spartan or luxurious but high maneuverability and minimum weight are requisite. The M5 has always been based on the current model BMW 5 series. There will always be baked in limitations on what the M Division can produce based on this philosophy. The costs (and subsequent sales price) to build a purpose built standalone M5 would be prohibitive. It would be highly unlikely that such a vehicle would receive BMW Corporate approval. As a frame of reference, the last high performance sports car built by BMW was the E52 Z8. There were a total of 5,703 Z8s built between 2002 and 2006. The production for the US was 2,382 units with an MSRP of $128,000. I would hazard a guess that the sales price of a "purpose built M5" would be well north of $175,000 with production numbers in the range of no more than 4,000, over a typical model run. Compared to model runs of plus 20,000 for the E39 and E60 M5s. Quote:
Last edited by DMC126; 02-25-2013 at 04:12 PM. |
||
![]() |
|
| 02-25-2013, 04:33 PM | #96 | |
|
FROZEN SILVER
Drives: '13 F10 M5 '12 E92 M3 Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
__________________
CURRENT RIDES - 13 MCB F10 M5 6MT / 12 FROZEN SILVER E92 M3 DCT / 03 GPW S2K AP1
PREVIOUS M CARS - 02 E39 M5 / 06 E60 M5 |
|
|
|
|
| 02-25-2013, 07:57 PM | #97 | |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 Silverstone F10 M5 DCT Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 344
iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 02-26-2013, 01:31 AM | #102 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 M5 SSII Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 02-26-2013, 10:05 AM | #103 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: Triple Black 2013 F10 M5 Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sunny San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,361
iTrader: (0)
|
F10 M5 RPi GTM Exhaust: Urban Assault
The F10 M5 may not be able to scream like the E60 M5 but it sure likes to roar! I can't speak for everyone but for me the RPi GTM makes owning the F10 M5 every bit as much fun as the E60 M5 by the notes of the exhausts only.
Here's a small video I shot yesterday with my GoPro. The sound was only recorded from the GoPro's standard onboard microphone. I didn't have my High Definition microphone with me yesterday. It still doesn't do the true sound justice, but it gives a better idea of how it sounds cruising around city streets. I was mostly just keeping it in 1st gear through the city then I revved it out on the highway. More to come!
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| 02-26-2013, 12:28 PM | #104 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 02-26-2013, 12:41 PM | #105 | |
|
Live for today tomorrow never comes
|
Quote:
I am getting the M5 for just longer distance driving , many thanks John
__________________
Live for now, life is too short.
2013 M5 LCI on Order for October. |
|
![]() |
|
| 02-26-2013, 08:47 PM | #106 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() |
__________________
2011 E90 335i M-Sport 6MT Alpine white - saddle brown
2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD Sport Edition Silver |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|