|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-22-2011, 11:36 AM | #23 |
Lieutenant
70
Rep 564
Posts |
Should be around 24 US mpg. I wonder what it will do in the city. Hopefully more like 17 mpg
__________________
More power please
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-22-2011, 11:54 AM | #24 |
Private First Class
58
Rep 149
Posts |
I know, right? I was hoping they addressed the fuel consumption and range issues of the previous M5. The only thing I remember more than it's impressive speed was the frequency of stops at the petrol station.
__________________
2016 M2 | LBB | Executive Pkg.| M Performance Exhaust | Dinan CAI | Fabspeed SportCat | standard-h.com | @standardh_
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-22-2011, 12:10 PM | #25 |
Second Lieutenant
30
Rep 268
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-22-2011, 12:16 PM | #27 |
Second Lieutenant
106
Rep 204
Posts
Drives: Not a BMW...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm here I'm there I'm F' everywhere I'm the eggman
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-22-2011, 05:52 PM | #29 |
New Member
0
Rep 9
Posts |
The E60 M5 had MPG of 11 / 17. Common sense would tell you the only way to get a combined MPG of ~24 for the F10 is high teens for city and >24 for the highway. That is a lot more than just 1 or 2 MPG improvement. Oh, and the F10 5 series have a 21 gallon tank, whereas the E60 have a 18.5.
I'm excited about the power and efficiency of this beast. My measly E60 550i does 15 / 23 MPG. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-24-2011, 12:38 PM | #31 |
Second Lieutenant
106
Rep 204
Posts
Drives: Not a BMW...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: I'm here I'm there I'm F' everywhere I'm the eggman
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|