M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain Modifications

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-23-2014, 02:15 PM   #67
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern X5M
Lucky with your DA. Best I've seen here is about +2000 and that is around 5-10C. Got to love the mineshaft air. Back when I was running a NA motor the difference between my setup and an identical vehicle at sea level was 0.5 seconds and about 5 mph.
Oh yeah my header/ intake tune S85 was the same way . Considering the DA difference I'm very pleased with the tune gains . It's def nice living in a city that is at or below sea level .... As long as it doesn't rain lol
Appreciate 0
      07-28-2014, 10:11 PM   #68
PetrolFumes
Major
349
Rep
1,417
Posts

Drives: Raptor, GT3RS,E92 M3,X5M50i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: FL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MpowerMike View Post
Installed it Yesterday wow what a difference pulls much harder and the turbo spool is much louder now especially with my cat less downpipes
Are you getting a check engine light with the catless DPs?
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2014, 02:28 PM   #69
MpowerMike
Major
MpowerMike's Avatar
360
Rep
1,123
Posts

Drives: 2012 IB BMW M5
Join Date: May 2014
Location: T.O. Canada

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowerrF10 View Post
Are you getting a check engine light with the catless DPs?
Yes i am , I'm using a code scanner to erase it most of the time.
__________________
2018 F90 BMW M5 Marina Bay Blue
2012 F10 BMW M5 Imperial Blue
2006 E60 BMW M5 Indianapolis Red
2006 E65 BMW 750i Titanium Silver
2001 E39 BMW 530i Orient Blue
Appreciate 0
      07-29-2014, 03:30 PM   #70
PetrolFumes
Major
349
Rep
1,417
Posts

Drives: Raptor, GT3RS,E92 M3,X5M50i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: FL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MpowerMike View Post
Yes i am , I'm using a code scanner to erase it most of the time.
No other issues other than a CEL?
Appreciate 0
      07-30-2014, 11:48 PM   #71
MpowerMike
Major
MpowerMike's Avatar
360
Rep
1,123
Posts

Drives: 2012 IB BMW M5
Join Date: May 2014
Location: T.O. Canada

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowerrF10 View Post
No other issues other than a CEL?
Nope!
Appreciate 0
      07-31-2014, 05:52 AM   #72
mstmng
Lieutenant Colonel
United Kingdom
141
Rep
1,837
Posts

Drives: M5 F10
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MpowerMike View Post
Yes i am , I'm using a code scanner to erase it most of the time.
could you please give me more info on code scanner!
i would like to use it as well
Appreciate 0
      08-12-2014, 10:51 PM   #73
PetrolFumes
Major
349
Rep
1,417
Posts

Drives: Raptor, GT3RS,E92 M3,X5M50i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: FL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
Def most of the gain was the DP's . The ECU limits peak gains with DP's but the gains in the midrange and the faster turbo spool up is substantial .
Ecu limits oeak gains with DPs??
Appreciate 0
      08-12-2014, 11:20 PM   #74
C's Bimmer
Lieutenant
C's Bimmer's Avatar
United_States
77
Rep
452
Posts

Drives: '15 M6 GC,'08 M5,'14 958 GTS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

BMS tune rocks, especially if you have a full exhaust system. Love it!
__________________

Current Garage:
*2015 Singapore Grey F06 M6 Gran Coupe (The Beast)
*2014 Black Cayenne GTS 958 (Wife & Kids Beast)
*2008 Imola Red E60 M5 (My Other Beast)
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2014, 05:27 AM   #75
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowerrF10
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
Def most of the gain was the DP's . The ECU limits peak gains with DP's but the gains in the midrange and the faster turbo spool up is substantial .
Ecu limits oeak gains with DPs??
The ECU has specific targets for airflow and power output , and continually adjusts boost timing etc to make this power level . SS did before and after dyno 'a with catless DP 'a and the peak whp gain was only 10hp ,but with almost 40whp gained in the midrange . Very good gains but the ECU doesn't allow the peak hp to increase much . You have to add a piggyback or a tune for that .
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2014, 09:18 PM   #76
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
Oh yeah my header/ intake tune S85 was the same way . Considering the DA difference I'm very pleased with the tune gains . It's def nice living in a city that is at or below sea level .... As long as it doesn't rain lol
gmd2003 I saw one post where you were saying when you ran 4lb boost on vbox it showed 3.5lb boost was stronger. Did you give it enough time to adapt? I tried to go back to 3.5 from 4lb and it seemed slower. I drove it for a week then I upped the boost and its hauling ass again. I could burn the hell out of second gear at 4lbs but when i went to 3.5 it seemed slower than what I was used to. Just wondering.
Thanks for the info
G
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2014, 09:32 PM   #77
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
Oh yeah my header/ intake tune S85 was the same way . Considering the DA difference I'm very pleased with the tune gains . It's def nice living in a city that is at or below sea level .... As long as it doesn't rain lol
gmd2003 I saw one post where you were saying when you ran 4lb boost on vbox it showed 3.5lb boost was stronger. Did you give it enough time to adapt? I tried to go back to 3.5 from 4lb and it seemed slower. I drove it for a week then I upped the boost and its hauling ass again. I could burn the hell out of second gear at 4lbs but when i went to 3.5 it seemed slower than what I was used to. Just wondering.
Thanks for the info
G
Yep for my car 3.75 seems to be the sweet spot on 93 octane ,4 is def not faster even after adapting . Maybe more tq down low but it messes up the CP goodness above 6k which more than counters that . Probably bc the CP is already running more boost up top than the standard car .
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 06:42 AM   #78
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
Yep for my car 3.75 seems to be the sweet spot on 93 octane ,4 is def not faster even after adapting . Maybe more tq down low but it messes up the CP goodness above 6k which more than counters that . Probably bc the CP is already running more boost up top than the standard car .
Makes sense.
I picked a vbox, now time do some testing on both cars. throw the drag radials on and see what I get.
What's the best mph to start when running for 60-130, any suggestions?
i think second gear would be a good start, less chance for error compared to starting off from a dig.
Ill do some 1/4 mile and make sure to pass the 130 mph mark to give both 1/4 runs and 60-130.
Just need some pointers, want to get some good data for everyone to look at.
Hopefully will find a good level stretch around here, if not I guess onto the track
Thanks

Last edited by m6beast; 08-14-2014 at 06:48 AM..
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 07:38 AM   #79
Andym3100k
Captain
Singapore
110
Rep
611
Posts

Drives: 2014 M6 GC FULL HAMMAN WIDE BO
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Singapore

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
Makes sense.
I picked a vbox, now time do some testing on both cars. throw the drag radials on and see what I get.
What's the best mph to start when running for 60-130, any suggestions?
i think second gear would be a good start, less chance for error compared to starting off from a dig.
Ill do some 1/4 mile and make sure to pass the 130 mph mark to give both 1/4 runs and 60-130.
Just need some pointers, want to get some good data for everyone to look at.
Hopefully will find a good level stretch around here, if not I guess onto the track
Thanks
Bro, love to see your number compare with gmd2003.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 08:36 AM   #80
JPMD
First Lieutenant
United_States
171
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Boca Raton, FL

iTrader: (0)

Can I get a link info/ordering for the VBOX?

Thanks guys
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 09:15 AM   #81
m6beast
Captain
m6beast's Avatar
185
Rep
792
Posts

Drives: stock m6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: nc

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andym3100k View Post
Bro, love to see your number compare with gmd2003.
Hopefully I'm close in comparison his car runs strong. I don't have CP package so don't know how comparable it will be. Either way we see where she stands.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 09:36 AM   #82
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Awesome it will be good to have some data from more people . I found a perfect zero slope road to do testing which is optimal but try to get as close to zero as possible . The downslope makes a huge difference in times so it's hard to compare a 0 to a -2.5 for instance .( less than -3% is legal though ) . I would start in 2nd gear at around 50mph , this puts you in the meat of the power band and gets you up to full boost by 60 ( may have traction issues is my only caveat ) . The 60-130 times from an isolated run like this is usually .3-.4 sec faster than an imbedded 60-130 mph in a 1/4 mile run . Also the DA plays a huge role in 60-130 mph ( I believe even more than the 1/4 mile trap ) . To give you a reference point my tuned 1/4 mile imbedded 60-130 was 7.8 on a + 2000 DA 0 slope and 7.5 on a isolated 60-130 0 slope +2000 DA . Let me know if you need anything !
George
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 12:04 PM   #83
Mike@N54Tuning.com
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Canada
4908
Rep
115,980
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i, 2015 M3
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: N54tuning.com

iTrader: (89)

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
Makes sense.
I picked a vbox, now time do some testing on both cars. throw the drag radials on and see what I get.
What's the best mph to start when running for 60-130, any suggestions?
i think second gear would be a good start, less chance for error compared to starting off from a dig.
Ill do some 1/4 mile and make sure to pass the 130 mph mark to give both 1/4 runs and 60-130.
Just need some pointers, want to get some good data for everyone to look at.
Hopefully will find a good level stretch around here, if not I guess onto the track
Thanks
BMS always got the best 60-130 times starting in 3rd at around 45mph. When you start in 2nd you have an extra shift that slows the time a bit. But if you are just trying to compare with others as long as you start the same way the comparison will still be valid.

Mike
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 12:08 PM   #84
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
Makes sense.
I picked a vbox, now time do some testing on both cars. throw the drag radials on and see what I get.
What's the best mph to start when running for 60-130, any suggestions?
i think second gear would be a good start, less chance for error compared to starting off from a dig.
Ill do some 1/4 mile and make sure to pass the 130 mph mark to give both 1/4 runs and 60-130.
Just need some pointers, want to get some good data for everyone to look at.
Hopefully will find a good level stretch around here, if not I guess onto the track
Thanks
BMS always got the best 60-130 times starting in 3rd at around 45mph. When you start in 2nd you have an extra shift that slows the time a bit. But if you are just trying to compare with others as long as you start the same way the comparison will still be valid.

Mike
FWIW When I get good traction second is always faster by about 2 tenths you just need to shift manually at 7k . If you let it get into the limiter then it will slow you down . I've done a LOT of 60-130 runs in this car > 20 .
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 04:52 PM   #85
wrsbmw
Major
wrsbmw's Avatar
107
Rep
1,027
Posts

Drives: 2018 Ferrari 488 Spider
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, Tx

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPMD View Post
Can I get a link info/ordering for the VBOX?

Thanks guys
here you go.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 07:03 PM   #86
JPMD
First Lieutenant
United_States
171
Rep
375
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW M5
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Boca Raton, FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrsbmw View Post
here you go.
Thanks which product do you use?
The performance box?
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 07:51 PM   #87
wrsbmw
Major
wrsbmw's Avatar
107
Rep
1,027
Posts

Drives: 2018 Ferrari 488 Spider
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, Tx

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPMD View Post
Thanks which product do you use?
The performance box?
Yes, I don't have an iphone so I bought that one. I have to load the files to the PC and then upload them to vboxtools.com in order to share the results. I think they are best when validated by the vboxtools site anyway.
Appreciate 0
      08-14-2014, 07:52 PM   #88
Hoopumpers
Captain
Hoopumpers's Avatar
113
Rep
672
Posts

Drives: M2 Comp
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
73 911 RSR  [0.00]
04 996 Cup  [0.00]
06 997 Cup  [0.00]
12 Boxster Spyder ( ...  [0.00]
15 Sierra HD Denali  [0.00]
16 GT3RS  [0.00]
17 Radical SR3  [0.00]
18 Model X  [0.00]
18 GT350R  [0.00]
19 M2 Comp  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by m6beast View Post
Makes sense.
I picked a vbox, now time do some testing on both cars. throw the drag radials on and see what I get.
What's the best mph to start when running for 60-130, any suggestions?
i think second gear would be a good start, less chance for error compared to starting off from a dig.
Ill do some 1/4 mile and make sure to pass the 130 mph mark to give both 1/4 runs and 60-130.
Just need some pointers, want to get some good data for everyone to look at.
Hopefully will find a good level stretch around here, if not I guess onto the track
Thanks
BMS always got the best 60-130 times starting in 3rd at around 45mph. When you start in 2nd you have an extra shift that slows the time a bit. But if you are just trying to compare with others as long as you start the same way the comparison will still be valid.

Mike
FWIW When I get good traction second is always faster by about 2 tenths you just need to shift manually at 7k . If you let it get into the limiter then it will slow you down . I've done a LOT of 60-130 runs in this car > 20 .
This
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 AM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST