Took my car to Byron Dragaway

[Sharpie12]

Originally Posted by GTM_Challenge

Great times so far, especially with the temps already at 80 deg. Did you do any dyno runs before and after the Eurocharged tune?

508whp stock, 568whp with tune. going on the dyno on the 27th to see what I gained with the dp's. thank you

[Tom C]

Originally Posted by Sharpie12

508whp stock, 568whp with tune. going on the dyno on the 27th to see what I gained with the dp's. thank you

Same dyno as the other runs?

[GTM_Challenge]

Originally Posted by Sharpie12

508whp stock, 568whp with tune. going on the dyno on the 27th to see what I gained with the dp's. thank you

Thanks for sharing the results. what were the TQ baseline/gains too. Usually you see more TQ than HP gains on turbo tunes. I know my X5M saw a big jump there.

[Sharpie12]

Originally Posted by GTM_Challenge

Thanks for sharing the results. what were the TQ baseline/gains too. Usually you see more TQ than HP gains on turbo tunes. I know my X5M saw a big jump there.

I don't remember my baseline torque but I know my hp went from 508 to 568 and my torque was 597 the second time.

[mainly]

still, not that great though eh?

i mean since stock m5's shave done 11.7's and 11.6's.

i know i was expecting better than a best time of 11.9 with my tune which is supposed to be making 700 hp. trap speed was a bit more respectable(122.88).

but still nothing like the tuned 5.5 amgs are doing... 11.3's and 11.4's with a tune and stock tires.

meanwhile their hp after tunes are reported as 660-680 crank. thats regardless of whether they started with 550 hp (performance package) or 518(non PP)

puzzling.

[Sharpie12]

Originally Posted by mainly

still, not that great though eh?

i mean since stock m5's shave done 11.7's and 11.6's.

i know i was expecting better than a best time of 11.9 with my tune which is supposed to be making 700 hp. trap speed was a bit more respectable(122.88).

but still nothing like the tuned 5.5 amgs are doing... 11.3's and 11.4's with a tune and stock tires.

meanwhile their hp after tunes are reported as 660-680 crank. thats regardless of whether they started with 550 hp (performance package) or 518(non PP)

puzzling.

Well when my 60' was 2.1-2.2 I trapped 124.5 which means my car is making a lot more power over stock but my ET was 12.1-12.2 this was on a very bad track. When I was stock I was trapping 119-120 and my ET was about the same. This is the first time my 60' was better than 2.1. I suppose all those people doing these times stock are getting really good launches and are at tracks at different altitudes plus the temps aren't 80 or more. I know I can so an 11.5 or better with my car. If I didn't getting a warning on my last run with that 1.8 60' I'm sure I would've.

[dhirm5]

Originally Posted by mainly

but still nothing like the tuned 5.5 amgs are doing... 11.3's and 11.4's with a tune and stock tires.

4wd AMGs?

[greentrbo95gst]

Maybe try shaving some weight as well and going with 1/4 tank of gas.

[Sharpie12]

Originally Posted by Tom C

Same dyno as the other runs?

its going to be the same dyno as when i dynoed stock. all dyno's were done on a mustang though

[Sharpie12]

Originally Posted by greentrbo95gst

Maybe try shaving some weight as well and going with 1/4 tank of gas.

at the end of the day i dont think 60lbs will do much. im not willing to do anything to the car to shave weight.

[jump]

Yep - It's luke