S63B44TU a beast of an engine vs. top sport cars

ONEOF40 FS M3 · 11-13-2013, 10:22 AM

The elasticity numbers is what really tells the story for me and what matters for me...see thread link

http://www.6post.com/forums/showthre...1#post14967566

ONEOF40 FS M3 · 11-13-2013, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ONEOF40 FS M3

The elasticity numbers is what really tells the story for me and what matters for me...see thread link

http://www.6post.com/forums/showthre...1#post14967566

100-300 km/h

R8 V10 - 36.3 sec
BMW M6 - 26.5 sec
NISSAN GTR - 32.6 sec
PORSCHE 911 TURBO S - 26.9 sec

wisesoul · 11-13-2013, 12:28 PM

I have a hard time believing that the M6 is faster than the new 991 TTS 100-300, especially when the 997 TTS could pull on the M6 and keep pace with 458 Italias from around that speed. But wow, the M6 stomped on the R8 and GTR when speeds got going. And M6 trapped more than 124mph on the 1/4 mile?!! 1/4 mile on the Porsche is quite absurd as well, what a monster.

RPiM5 · 11-13-2013, 12:57 PM

Solid numbers on that M6. Love it. I honestly thought the new Porsche Turbo would be faster, still impressive though. I remember driving the non-Comp Pack M6 at the track and being a little afraid to go full throttle coming out of some turns where another turn was quickly coming up. Didn't really get that feeling in the M5, but still fast.

MichaelJohn · 11-13-2013, 02:40 PM

Wow, those rolling acceleration numbers are staggering. After they get going the M6 is actually gaining on the Porsche - hard to believe. I know that one of the big deciding factors for me buying the M5 was watching a stock M5 pull on a late model GTR from a roll on YouTube. I don't care about stoplight racing, too dangerous and show-offy for me. Just give me that afterburner thrust when I want to get around somebody. That being said, 0-60 in the new Turbo S must be a real thrill ride.

URBAN LEGEND · 11-13-2013, 02:45 PM

Elasticity? Please define.

Tom C · 11-13-2013, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by URBAN LEGEND

Elasticity? Please define.

I believe he is referring to the in-gear acceleration figures Elastizitat:

60-100km/h in 4th gear
80-100km/h in 5th gear
80-100km/h in 6/7th gear

ONEOF40 FS M3 · 11-13-2013, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

I believe he is referring to the in-gear acceleration figures Elastizitat:

60-100km/h in 4th gear
80-100km/h in 5th gear
80-100km/h in 6/7th gear

That is correct!!!

ONEOF40 FS M3 · 11-13-2013, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by URBAN LEGEND

Elasticity? Please define.

In gear acceleration

Rolling acceleration

mstmng · 11-13-2013, 08:37 PM

crazy, but m6 has longest stopping distance and stops quicker in cold weather LOL

M all the way !!!

Marcus Frost · 11-14-2013, 01:52 AM

I recently had the pleasure of running a friend in his '14 M6 multiple times at speed. While I cannot comment on how it compares to specific cars, what I can say that car above 75mph is extremely, extremely fast. While the car will trap somewhere in the low 120s, for whatever reason 4th gear on up this car opens up like crazy. I would venture an educated guess that a car would need to trap in the high 120s to be able to hold up against an S63tu M6.

I was truly amazed at how fast that car gets in triple digit speeds. At 20-30 mph both power and traction are limited, so it was not as fast, but again... on top, it was very impressive.

-m

Phatcat · 11-14-2013, 02:55 AM

Just got latest Sport Auto today, they did a comparison between RS7, Panamera Turbo, M6 Gran Coupe with CP, and CLS S 4 Matic.

RS7: 0-100km 3.8, 0-160km 8.1, 0-200km 12.5.
M6 Gran Coupe: 4.2, 8.3, and 12.2.
CLS 63: 3.8, 8.0, and 11.9.
Panamera Turbo: 4.0, 8.9, and 13.9.

In gear acceleration. 80-120km and 80-160km. 4/5/6/7/8 gear.

RS7: 2.9/3.9/5.5/8.0/14.3, 6.0/7.9/10.8/14.7/24.7
M6: 3.5/4.5/5.9/8.2, 7.1/9.4/12.0/16.3
CLS 63: 3.4/4.8/6.5, 7.0/9.8/12.8
Panamera Turbo: 3.6/5.9/8.1/17.2, 7.6/10.8/15.3/31.4

Hockenheim

RS7: 1.13.4
M6: 1.13.6
CLS 63: 1.13.6
Panamera Turbo: 1.12.6

11-13-2013, 10:22 AM	#1
ONEOF40 FS M3 FROZEN SILVER 112 Rep 466 Posts Drives: '12 E92 M3 FS EDITION Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: South Florida iTrader: (0) Garage List 2014 PORSCHE 991 C2S [0.00] 2012 BMW E92 M3 DCT [0.00] 2003 HONDA AP1 S2K [0.00]	S63B44TU a beast of an engine vs. top sport cars The elasticity numbers is what really tells the story for me and what matters for me...see thread link http://www.6post.com/forums/showthre...1#post14967566 __________________ CURRENT RIDES - 16 991 GTS 7MT/ 12 FROZEN SILVER E92 M3 / 03 GPW S2K AP1 PREVIOUS M CARS - 02 E39 M5 / 06 E60 M5 / F10 M5 6MT 14 991 C2S
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

11-13-2013, 12:28 PM	#3
wisesoul Savoir Faire 74 Rep 1,772 Posts Drives: 2013 BMW M5 Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Los Angeles, Ca iTrader: (0)	I have a hard time believing that the M6 is faster than the new 991 TTS 100-300, especially when the 997 TTS could pull on the M6 and keep pace with 458 Italias from around that speed. But wow, the M6 stomped on the R8 and GTR when speeds got going. And M6 trapped more than 124mph on the 1/4 mile?!! 1/4 mile on the Porsche is quite absurd as well, what a monster. __________________ Current: Alpine White F10 M5\|H&R springs\|12mm/10mm spacers\|Eisenmann Race Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3\|MTM 10mm spacers\|Hotchkis rear sway bar\|APR Stage 1\|Milltek Catless\|RNS-E\|Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel Sold:E46 323i
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-13-2013, 12:57 PM	#4
RPiM5 Major General 2872 Rep 7,885 Posts Drives: Black M5 Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Earth 616 iTrader: (0)	Solid numbers on that M6. Love it. I honestly thought the new Porsche Turbo would be faster, still impressive though. I remember driving the non-Comp Pack M6 at the track and being a little afraid to go full throttle coming out of some turns where another turn was quickly coming up. Didn't really get that feeling in the M5, but still fast. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-13-2013, 02:40 PM	#5
MichaelJohn First Lieutenant 88 Rep 311 Posts Drives: BMW i8, Kia EV6 GT Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: SF Bay Area iTrader: (0)	Wow, those rolling acceleration numbers are staggering. After they get going the M6 is actually gaining on the Porsche - hard to believe. I know that one of the big deciding factors for me buying the M5 was watching a stock M5 pull on a late model GTR from a roll on YouTube. I don't care about stoplight racing, too dangerous and show-offy for me. Just give me that afterburner thrust when I want to get around somebody. That being said, 0-60 in the new Turbo S must be a real thrill ride.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-13-2013, 02:45 PM	#6
URBAN LEGEND Rocky 412 Rep 3,085 Posts Drives: 16 M5, 18 ZL1 1LE, 18 M3 Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Brenham TX iTrader: (0)	Elasticity? Please define.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-13-2013, 08:37 PM	#10
mstmng Lieutenant Colonel 141 Rep 1,837 Posts Drives: M5 F10 Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: London iTrader: (0)	crazy, but m6 has longest stopping distance and stops quicker in cold weather LOL M all the way !!!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-14-2013, 01:52 AM	#11
Marcus Frost Custom User Title 80 Rep 103 Posts Drives: Various Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Chicago, IL iTrader: (0)	I recently had the pleasure of running a friend in his '14 M6 multiple times at speed. While I cannot comment on how it compares to specific cars, what I can say that car above 75mph is extremely, extremely fast. While the car will trap somewhere in the low 120s, for whatever reason 4th gear on up this car opens up like crazy. I would venture an educated guess that a car would need to trap in the high 120s to be able to hold up against an S63tu M6. I was truly amazed at how fast that car gets in triple digit speeds. At 20-30 mph both power and traction are limited, so it was not as fast, but again... on top, it was very impressive. -m __________________ 2014 BMW M6 Coupe, Sakhir/Black, 6-Speed, CCB - DME/AMS/Eisenmann/Rogue/KW/MORR 2018 BMW m760i, Frozen Black/Black 2016 BMW X5 35d, Alpine White/Black, MSport 1969 Lincoln Continental Sedan
	Appreciate 0 Quote

11-14-2013, 02:55 AM	#12
Phatcat Lieutenant Colonel 751 Rep 1,857 Posts Drives: BMW M5, X5M Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Asia iTrader: (0)	Just got latest Sport Auto today, they did a comparison between RS7, Panamera Turbo, M6 Gran Coupe with CP, and CLS S 4 Matic. RS7: 0-100km 3.8, 0-160km 8.1, 0-200km 12.5. M6 Gran Coupe: 4.2, 8.3, and 12.2. CLS 63: 3.8, 8.0, and 11.9. Panamera Turbo: 4.0, 8.9, and 13.9. In gear acceleration. 80-120km and 80-160km. 4/5/6/7/8 gear. RS7: 2.9/3.9/5.5/8.0/14.3, 6.0/7.9/10.8/14.7/24.7 M6: 3.5/4.5/5.9/8.2, 7.1/9.4/12.0/16.3 CLS 63: 3.4/4.8/6.5, 7.0/9.8/12.8 Panamera Turbo: 3.6/5.9/8.1/17.2, 7.6/10.8/15.3/31.4 Hockenheim RS7: 1.13.4 M6: 1.13.6 CLS 63: 1.13.6 Panamera Turbo: 1.12.6
	Appreciate 0 Quote