|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-12-2010, 09:07 PM | #28 |
Colonel
129
Rep 2,218
Posts |
^ I think a blown V10 was on the menu at one point, not sure why they went v8 over v10...
__________________
- 2014 CPO i01 BEV Electronaut Edition Capparis White Tera World, '17- - 2015 CPO i01 BEV Laurel Grey Tera World, '17- - 2015 i01 REx Laurel Grey Tera World, '15-'17 - 2003 CPO 330i ZHP Imola Red Build 03/03/03, '06-'15 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-12-2010, 09:20 PM | #29 |
Administrator
40786
Rep 21,239
Posts |
How can you be disappointed when official 0-60 #'s have not released for the upcoming M5? We haven't even seen the actual car yet! These #'s are just speculation by a magazine. THEY ARE NOT OFFICIAL.
__________________
Check on the Latest BMW News
Become a fan of Bimmerpost Facebook Follow us on Bimmerpost Twitter Subscribe to Bimmerpost Youtube Channel |
Appreciate
0
|
01-13-2010, 03:40 AM | #30 |
Captain
47
Rep 726
Posts |
I'm honestly surprised that people take the manufacturer's 0-60 times so seriously anymore. I have no doubt that with those kind of specs, the car will get to 60 substantially faster than 4.4 seconds.
I wonder if this car will be heavier than the CTS-V?
__________________
2007 E92 335i--SG, Fully loaded, minus the dead weight..err..iDrive and Active Steering. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2010, 01:58 PM | #31 |
New Member
3
Rep 9
Posts |
0-62
Hey guys, in my post i write 4.4 for 0-62MPH not 60 . This is much faster than the e60 M5! He did only 4.7 for 0-62MPH .
The measurement here in Europe is always 0-100KM/H wich is aproximately 62 MPH. Thanks |
Appreciate
0
|
02-06-2010, 06:05 AM | #36 |
Banned
43
Rep 2,406
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|