BMW M5 F10 PP-Performance 700hp Tuned by PP-Performance Baku / Azerbaijan

Aynar100 · 10-17-2013, 03:38 PM

This results was with 98 fuel and stock tires

wzj519 · 10-17-2013, 04:03 PM

This is a true beast. Good job again PP performance.
BTW, When will you guys release some products for my 650GC?

frisco_415 · 10-17-2013, 05:03 PM

nə qədər?

singularity · 10-17-2013, 05:57 PM

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013awm5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

0-60: 3.67s
0-100: 7.70s
0-120: 10.70s
0-130: 12.49s
60-130: 8.82s
1/4m: 11.69 @ 125.56mph

Northern X5M · 10-17-2013, 06:46 PM

Yeah same here. On drag radials I am hitting 11.68 @ 121mph bone stock with 2000-3000 DA.

mstmng · 10-17-2013, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013awm5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

0-60: 3.67s
0-100: 7.70s
0-120: 10.70s
0-130: 12.49s
60-130: 8.82s
1/4m: 11.69 @ 125.56mph

Loooooool

Jay-K · 10-17-2013, 08:27 PM

very nice, any idea where we can get "race logic" device like that?

Aynar100 · 10-17-2013, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay-K

very nice, any idea where we can get "race logic" device like that?

U can get it from www.racelogic.com or from Ebay

Aynar100 · 10-17-2013, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013awm5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

0-60: 3.67s
0-100: 7.70s
0-120: 10.70s
0-130: 12.49s
60-130: 8.82s
1/4m: 11.69 @ 125.56mph

Its not possible man

Aynar100 · 10-17-2013, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013awm5

[IMG]http://f10.m5post.com/forums/attachm...7&d=1347558392[/IMG]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown

[IMG]http://f10.m5post.com/forums/attachm...1&d=1377598573[/IMG]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

0-60: 3.67s
0-100: 7.70s
0-120: 10.70s
0-130: 12.49s
60-130: 8.82s
1/4m: 11.69 @ 125.56mph

Look 60-130mph (100-200km/h) very slow than my car

Aynar100 · 10-18-2013, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2013awm5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom C

0-60: 3.67s
0-100: 7.70s
0-120: 10.70s
0-130: 12.49s
60-130: 8.82s
1/4m: 11.69 @ 125.56mph

Look your 60-130mph (100-200km/h) very slow than my car

Boss330 · 10-18-2013, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aynar100

Look your 60-130mph (100-200km/h) very slow than my car

I can't see a 60-130MPH time on any of the timeslips?

Boss330 · 10-18-2013, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

I believe it's very hard to improve the 1/4-mile times on a M5 without using drag radials etc. Even in stock form the car has serious traction issues.

You would only see the difference in a GTBoard type shootout with a rolling start from 50km/h to topspeed. That's where you could see the difference between the Manhart M6 vs stock, when they tested that one back in May.

In a standings start situation, you won't have any useable gains in ET, as traction is limited.

URBAN LEGEND · 10-18-2013, 07:02 AM

Give the guy a break...
Then we complain when no one releases a tune for the F10 M5. If that's the reception I wouldn't bother either.

Tom C · 10-18-2013, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aynar100

Look your 60-130mph (100-200km/h) very slow than my car

First of all do the math... 60-130mph DOES NOT EQUAL 100-200km/h which is 62.1mph to 124.2mph.

Someone cut and pasted an excerpt of my vbox data. Here are a rolling run and standing start run converted to metric figures:

On the standing start run without using any roll-out or launch control:
0-100km/h: 4.15
0-160km/h: 7.97
0-200km/h: 11.76
100-200km/h: 7.61

On the rolling start:
100-200km/h: 7.34

My car has K&N drop-in filters and Supersprint Race mufflers... that is it. Full weight (a little more than 1/2 tank of gas) and my 240+lbs (109kg) at the helm.

singularity · 10-18-2013, 10:12 AM

We're talking about a 1 ft roll start or a rolling start? Either way your results were no worse than his, even taking K&N, environment, slope, temperature, surface etc account

Boss330 · 10-18-2013, 12:21 PM

I hope you're not driving without seatbelts... Because that's stupid

Tom C · 10-18-2013, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

We're talking about a 1 ft roll start or a rolling start? Either way your results were no worse than his, even taking K&N, environment, slope, temperature, surface etc account

The rolling start time was going from 40mph and then nailing the throttle.

You can configure the vbox to report the acceleration times with a 1 foot roll-out. So it merely is chopping the time it takes to go 1 foot to simulate the timing lights at a drag strip. So the 0-100km/h time would have been 3.81s with a 1 foot roll out. Otherwise, the roll-out has no bearing on the 100-200km/h times.

Aynar100 · 10-18-2013, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boss330

Quote:

Originally Posted by singularity

Your results are no better than of a stock car

reminds me of this

I believe it's very hard to improve the 1/4-mile times on a M5 without using drag radials etc. Even in stock form the car has serious traction issues.

You would only see the difference in a GTBoard type shootout with a rolling start from 50km/h to topspeed. That's where you could see the difference between the Manhart M6 vs stock, when they tested that one back in May.

In a standings start situation, you won't have any useable gains in ET, as traction is limited.

Thats right! Bravo!

Aynar100 · 10-18-2013, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boss330

I hope you're not driving without seatbelts... Because that's stupid

Hahahahahah

singularity · 10-18-2013, 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boss330

I hope you're not driving without seatbelts... Because that's stupid

Don't mind this poor soul, he doesn't know that PP-Performance Stage 3 VIP GOLD guarantees a place in heaven in case of a crash.

Boss330 · 10-18-2013, 02:14 PM

Nice car BTW

10-17-2013, 03:38 PM	#1
Aynar100 New Member 4 Rep 17 Posts Drives: BMW M5 F10 One of 1 Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Azerbaijan,Baku iTrader: (0)	BMW M5 F10 PP-Performance 700hp Tuned by PP-Performance Baku / Azerbaijan This results was with 98 fuel and stock tires Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-17-2013, 04:03 PM	#2
wzj519 Captain 92 Rep 846 Posts Drives: 2017 M3 COMP PKG Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Toronto iTrader: (0)	This is a true beast. Good job again PP performance. BTW, When will you guys release some products for my 650GC? __________________ 2012 X6 35I (Gone) 2013 650 GC (Gone) 2014 M5 Comp PKG (Gone) 2015 X6 50I (Gone) 2017 M3 Comp PKG 2017 MINI JCW 991.2 GT3 (coming)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-17-2013, 05:03 PM	#3
frisco_415 New Member 2 Rep 5 Posts Drives: F10 M5, E36 M3 Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: San Francisco iTrader: (0)	nə qədər?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-17-2013, 06:46 PM	#5
Northern X5M Captain 105 Rep 806 Posts Drives: 2014 Tanzanite Blue M5 Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada iTrader: (0)	Yeah same here. On drag radials I am hitting 11.68 @ 121mph bone stock with 2000-3000 DA. __________________ 2014 ///M5 CP Tanzanite Blue/Cohiba - 11.15 @ 128.8 & 1.84 60' (2150' DA) - BPM Tune - MSR Intake - SSP DCT - SS DPs & HFC Mid Pipes/X-Over - E Race Muffs - 19" MT DRs... On to a new home.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-17-2013, 08:27 PM	#7
Jay-K Brigadier General 384 Rep 3,450 Posts Drives: Slow Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: LA iTrader: (0)	very nice, any idea where we can get "race logic" device like that? __________________ "Well, there's a straight-six engine at the front, a manual gearbox in the middle and drive goes to the back. That's Page 1, Chapter 1 from the petrosexual handbook" - JC
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-18-2013, 07:02 AM	#14
URBAN LEGEND Rocky 412 Rep 3,085 Posts Drives: 16 M5, 18 ZL1 1LE, 18 M3 Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Brenham TX iTrader: (0)	Give the guy a break... Then we complain when no one releases a tune for the F10 M5. If that's the reception I wouldn't bother either.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-18-2013, 10:12 AM	#16
singularity Driver 94 Rep 636 Posts Drives: M5 (F10) Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Slovakia iTrader: (0)	We're talking about a 1 ft roll start or a rolling start? Either way your results were no worse than his, even taking K&N, environment, slope, temperature, surface etc account
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-18-2013, 12:21 PM	#17
Boss330 Major General 1714 Rep 5,110 Posts Drives: BMW Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Earth iTrader: (0)	I hope you're not driving without seatbelts... Because that's stupid Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-18-2013, 02:14 PM	#22
Boss330 Major General 1714 Rep 5,110 Posts Drives: BMW Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Earth iTrader: (0)	Nice car BTW
	Appreciate 0 Quote