2012 BMW M5 (F10) - Wallpapers, Official Information, Specs, Reviews, and Videos

[IancoleTX]

Fap fap fap fap

[nemex12]

Originally Posted by Mondrian

Far too similar...

still,audi ones look fairly better

[wisesoul]

This is what I need. I want Alpine/Mineral White on an Indy Red or Sakhir Orange interior please!! Hope it still has those active side bolsters. Shit this car will be fast

[formula M]

Originally Posted by Kurt_OH

Wow. Barely more HP than the outgoing model, and NONE more than CTS-V.

Kind of a disappointment, to go with the bitter pill of turbo lag.

Goodbye, M-as-a-drivers-car; hello M-as-PURELY-a-poseurs-car.

Yuk.

What about horsepower again..? And why does that matter..?

All that matters is over-all performance, including efficiency. Obviously, a cars handling (& reality), doesn't merit high on your objectionality, so once again, you define a car solely on it's HP. That argument is getting old.

I think the M5's driveability will make this car a phun M (more people driving it, more spirited driving). Only drag racers will be upset & who cares about them when u own a BMW..?

[Norsk]

Looks pretty

[Greer]

Looks Great, but will it beat the 2011 Cadillac CTS V around the ring?

[e92sport]

This car better run a very low 12 second 1/4 mile...

[CAPSGOD]

I think it looks better than the E63 AMG. This is the first time I liked an F10.

[SlammedM6]

looks great...

6 piston fronts look good...but it worries that me that there are no pics of the rear calipers..I have a feeling they are the same ugly, naked calipers... which would be a HUGE fail IMO.

[d3l0n]

its cool.. i just felt its looks more bad ass with camo on…. maybe cuz it doesn't have black wheels :-)

[Yurka]

Im not very impressed at all with the numbers. Disappointing.

[ron_jeremy]

Originally Posted by JasonCSU

It's funny how everyone is enamored with the color of brake calipers and not noticing that they appear to be 6 piston calipers.

Yeah, pretty much sums it up nicely.
Paper specs are so important in here.
Comparing a Cad to the M5 is pretty much a joke imo, power is one thing, handling something completely different.
And that's where the M excels, it always has, it always will.
Look at an M next to the Audi and Merc...

So be sure of a couple of things:
1. F10 M5 will be better, and as a daily driver than the E60 M5 - it should be easier to drive, more comfort when you want it to, and sportier if "your in a hurry".
And on the track - it will be faster there to.
2. mileage, F10 M5 should do at least 20% better, with a 100k car, i'm not to sure if that's remotly intresting but...

Wonder how fat it is though?

[cracker123]

Originally Posted by ron_jeremy

Yeah, pretty much sums it up nicely.
Paper specs are so important in here.
Comparing a Cad to the M5 is pretty much a joke imo, power is one thing, handling something completely different.
And that's where the M excels, it always has, it always will.
Look at an M next to the Audi and Merc...

So be sure of a couple of things:
1. F10 M5 will be better, and as a daily driver than the E60 M5 - it should be easier to drive, more comfort when you want it to, and sportier if "your in a hurry".
And on the track - it will be faster there to.
2. mileage, F10 M5 should do at least 20% better, with a 100k car, i'm not to sure if that's remotly intresting but...

Wonder how fat it is though?

Greating looking car.

Talking about mileage the new CLS63 AMG does not have a gas guz tax. I am assuming the M5 will be the same as well.

[Robert]

Never thought I would say this, I wish Bangle is back. While the design is pleasing to the eye the overall feeling is vanilla. Does not evoke the same bold, controversial statement Bangle did with BMW.

[andrex-1]

it so good...

[IS3andME]

Originally Posted by Kurt_OH

Wow. Barely more HP than the outgoing model, and NONE more than CTS-V.

Kind of a disappointment, to go with the bitter pill of turbo lag.

Goodbye, M-as-a-drivers-car; hello M-as-PURELY-a-poseurs-car.

Yuk.

The car hasn't even been officially tested yet, and you are already downing the car, epic bench racing....

[silentassasin]

[quote=formula M;9820100]

Originally Posted by Kurt_OH

Wow. Barely more HP than the outgoing model, and NONE more than CTS-V.

Kind of a disappointment, to go with the bitter pill of turbo lag.

Goodbye, M-as-a-drivers-car; hello M-as-PURELY-a-poseurs-car.

Yuk.

What about horsepower again..? And why does that matter..?

All that matters is over-all performance, including efficiency. Obviously, a cars handling (

[Matt01]

FOR SALE-

one good wife, one good daughter and one good cat....

Price; one new BMW M5

[yamazaho]

I WANT ONE!!!

[jonasaurus]

Wow

[Wrx328]

Win win win wow amazing

[adamalexxx]

Nice