BMW F10 M5 Hits 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and Quarter Mile in 12.0 seconds @ 122mph! - Page 5 - M5POST

Jblack4083 · 10-26-2011, 09:42 PM

Does anyone have a strange feeling that the turbos themselves are already close to being maxed out as far as pressure goes? I think people are expecting them to crank an extra 300HP out of the car. If the turbos are at capacity then that might not be possible. Theres cooling and better plumbing but still I'm not sure if they will be able to see huge gains.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phish_100

This car is going to be sheer filth. Terrifying in every way. A total and utter beast. I am squirting poo in my pants with excitement. This is the best overall M car ever. Holy mother of the lord Jesus Christ fuck yes. Bring it on...

SQUIRTING ?!?!?! :lol

wisesoul · 10-26-2011, 09:51 PM

THATS damn fast. WOW

Evooooo · 10-26-2011, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jblack4083

Does anyone have a strange feeling that the turbos themselves are already close to being maxed out as far as pressure goes? I think people are expecting them to crank an extra 300HP out of the car. If the turbos are at capacity then that might not be possible. Theres cooling and better plumbing but still I'm not sure if they will be able to see huge gains.

Quote:

Originally Posted by phish_100

This car is going to be sheer filth. Terrifying in every way. A total and utter beast. I am squirting poo in my pants with excitement. This is the best overall M car ever. Holy mother of the lord Jesus Christ fuck yes. Bring it on...

SQUIRTING ?!?!?! :lol

There is no way they would allow a stock tuned m5's turbos run at it's Mac capacity. I say this because than they would be warrantying blow turbos and that's just not cost efficient. They probably figured out a way to get turbos which are a little bigger than the stock ones in there. The m3 motor was rated at 414hp so it can definitely be achieved easily while keeping the turbos very efficient.

Kayani_1 · 10-26-2011, 09:54 PM

The M3 will be faster then the current M3. But they will not make it faster then M5 or M6.

But then again M3 is more about light weight, agility and handling then outright speed. As was the case with E90 M vs E60 M5.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muffnbluff

Should be interesting to see what the F80 M3 does in a couple years.

GMW · 10-26-2011, 09:58 PM

Anyone missing the v10 now?

M3 Adjuster · 10-26-2011, 09:59 PM

[quote=1MVO;10686683]This should silence all the detractors of using turbos in an M car.[/QUOTE

Well, everyone but FFPM, who apparently checked into the wrong forum since he wants to talk M3. Lol.

dpwr · 10-26-2011, 10:21 PM

damn, i need more $$$$$$$$

Fraggy · 10-26-2011, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpwr

damn, i need more $$$$$$$$

Yup. 95 grand is insane!

EdwinF10 · 10-26-2011, 10:28 PM

That's pretty quick for a family saloon.

e46e92love · 10-26-2011, 10:42 PM

What really disappoints me is how many people see 0-60 times and HP/TQ numbers and drool, regardless of how it handles or feels. Regardless of whether the thing that has made so special for so many year still exists.

If 0-60, 1/4 mile and HP numbers are all that matters than, why would you ever have looked at anything but a cadillac or merc?

But now I realize why they have done this, because this what the majority wanted, as told by the response to this car. ///M got it right for the majority of you, but that doesn't mean they got it right.

Cheers,
e46e92

e46e92love · 10-26-2011, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMW

Anyone missing the v10 now?

Yeah, me.......

Cheers,
e46e92

Q4P · 10-26-2011, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jblack4083

Does anyone have a strange feeling that the turbos themselves are already close to being maxed out as far as pressure goes? I think people are expecting them to crank an extra 300HP out of the car. If the turbos are at capacity then that might not be possible. Theres cooling and better plumbing but still I'm not sure if they will be able to see huge gains.

SQUIRTING ?!?!?! :lol

You are probably right... there will definitely be gains from tuning but I doubt they'll be massive, this car is already making 550 horsepower from the factory.

OwnAge · 10-26-2011, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WRXXX

Just STFU already!

+1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kayani_1

The M3 will be faster then the current M3. But they will not make it faster then M5 or M6.

But then again M3 is more about light weight, agility and handling then outright speed. As was the case with E90 M vs E60 M5.

Yeah it prolly going to be 460-485hp.

e92ben · 10-26-2011, 11:22 PM

Whoever isn't impressed is
Def full of sh*t. The car is still a heavy 5 series... 3.7 for a stock is just insane for that car, let alone matching Ferrari F-430s time around the ring. Even makes it better.. Wow

doozyj · 10-26-2011, 11:43 PM

Wow, these are GT-R numbers!

iceman335 · 10-26-2011, 11:48 PM

Holy mother of Jesus Christ....

AndreyATC · 10-27-2011, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jblack4083

Does anyone have a strange feeling that the turbos themselves are already close to being maxed out as far as pressure goes? I think people are expecting them to crank an extra 300HP out of the car. If the turbos are at capacity then that might not be possible. Theres cooling and better plumbing but still I'm not sure if they will be able to see huge gains.

Far from max...
X6M has decent gains with just tune, something like 620HP
Good intake, exhaust and tune should bring this M5 to some crazy HP numbers

However, this thing is insane as is

dlbrooks18 · 10-27-2011, 01:15 AM

^Agreed!

clar · 10-27-2011, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e46e92love

///M got it right for the majority of you, but that doesn't mean they got it right.

e46e92

Whether or not they got it right is entirely subjective. At the end of the day, it's the people buying it that matters, whether they are repeat buyers or new ones. No one person's opinion is more definitive than the other when it comes to "getting it right." It's just a car. No need to get all religious about it...

BMW86 · 10-27-2011, 01:43 AM

122mph!??? What a beast!!

swamp2 · 10-27-2011, 02:00 AM

Sick numbers. I called them pretty precisely with my favorite physics based software prediction tool CarTest way back in April before we even had exact power or weight numbers.

The next M3 should match or exceed if history repeats (at "lower" speeds). Of course at high speeds the M5 will dominate based on much more hp.

red-sauerkraut · 10-27-2011, 02:05 AM

With a proper tune, and a few simple tweaks, this motor will make 650hp+ with ease.

10-26-2011, 09:51 PM	#90
wisesoul Savoir Faire Drives: 2013 BMW M5 Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Los Angeles, Ca Posts: 1,119 iTrader: (0)	THATS damn fast. WOW __________________ Current: AW/SO F10 M5 Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3, MTM 10mm spacers, Hotchkis rear sway bar, APR Stage 1, Milltek Catless, RNS-E, Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel Sold:E46 323i

10-26-2011, 09:58 PM	#93
GMW Captain Drives: a Submarine Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Victoria, BC Posts: 608 iTrader: (0)	Anyone missing the v10 now? __________________ 11' e92 M3 - current 10' S1000RR - miss it every day 08' e93 335 - new owner 07' e91 328xi - new owner 06' e90 330xi - new owner

10-26-2011, 09:59 PM	#94
M3 Adjuster Colonel Drives: 1988 M3 gone .. 1M HERE!! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, Tx Posts: 2,677 iTrader: (0)	[quote=1MVO;10686683]This should silence all the detractors of using turbos in an M car.[/QUOTE Well, everyone but FFPM, who apparently checked into the wrong forum since he wants to talk M3. Lol. __________________ Lone Star BMW CCA Chapter president, Chief Driving Instructor

10-26-2011, 10:28 PM	#97
EdwinF10 Major Drives: f10 535d M & e70 X5 Xdrive35d Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 1,077 iTrader: (0)	That's pretty quick for a family saloon. __________________ 2004 e87 118d (ret.), 2006 e92 335d (ret.), 2007 e92 330d (ret.), 2007 e87 130i M-sport (ret.), 2009 e92 M3 (ret.) 2009 e70 X5 35d & 2010 f10 535d M-sport

10-26-2011, 10:42 PM	#98
e46e92love Colonel Drives: e92 ///M3; X3 (wife's) Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: The East Side of Things Posts: 2,990 iTrader: (0)	What really disappoints me is how many people see 0-60 times and HP/TQ numbers and drool, regardless of how it handles or feels. Regardless of whether the thing that has made so special for so many year still exists. If 0-60, 1/4 mile and HP numbers are all that matters than, why would you ever have looked at anything but a cadillac or merc? But now I realize why they have done this, because this what the majority wanted, as told by the response to this car. ///M got it right for the majority of you, but that doesn't mean they got it right. Cheers, e46e92 __________________ "...it's not about the money and not about the brand of the car, it's about handling,performance and passion......And that, no other car has all together like an M3........when you talk about the most complete car the M is invincible." --Tony Kanaan.

10-26-2011, 10:21 PM	#95
dpwr Captain Drives: a good one Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Toronto Posts: 839 iTrader: (0)	damn, i need more $$$$$$$$

10-26-2011, 11:22 PM	#102
e92ben Major Drives: 2007 335i coupe Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Kenosha Wi Posts: 1,300 iTrader: (3)	Whoever isn't impressed is Def full of sh*t. The car is still a heavy 5 series... 3.7 for a stock is just insane for that car, let alone matching Ferrari F-430s time around the ring. Even makes it better.. Wow __________________ e92 335i.... Jb4 G5 iso, Helix FMIC, RissRacing catless Dp's, Dinan exhaust, BMS dci, BMW performance electronic V2-ebrake-shift boot, full M3 interior swap novillo & speed cloth, H&R coilovers, OZ ultras, M3 front bumper, CF hood & trunk, LCI tails, much more...

10-26-2011, 11:43 PM	#103
doozyj First Lieutenant Drives: 2007 M Coupe Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: SoCal Posts: 326 iTrader: (8)	Wow, these are GT-R numbers! __________________ 2007 /// M Coupe Alpine White / Light Sepang Bronze 6MT 2003 /// M3 Alpine White / Imola Red SMG II (Sunroof Delete) SOLD

10-26-2011, 11:48 PM	#104
iceman335 Private First Class Drives: 2012 F25 X3 xDrive35i M-Sport Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Posts: 145 iTrader: (0)	Holy mother of Jesus Christ....

10-27-2011, 01:15 AM	#106
dlbrooks18 Brigadier General Drives: e90 335i Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,186 iTrader: (2)	^Agreed! __________________ 2008 E90 335

10-27-2011, 01:43 AM	#108
BMW86 Major General Drives: BMW 135i / Kawa Ninja Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 8,613 iTrader: (0)	122mph!??? What a beast!! __________________ BMW 135i N54 TWIN TURBO Quarter Mile 12.173@113.70mph - Street Tyres Queensland Raceway Sprint 1:01:22 - Street Tyres Queensland Raceway Clubman 1:04:74 - Street Tyres Lakeside Raceway 1:03:97 - Street Tyres

10-27-2011, 02:00 AM	#109
swamp2 Major General Drives: E92 M3 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: San Diego, CA USA Posts: 8,313 iTrader: (1)	Sick numbers. I called them pretty precisely with my favorite physics based software prediction tool CarTest way back in April before we even had exact power or weight numbers. The next M3 should match or exceed if history repeats (at "lower" speeds). Of course at high speeds the M5 will dominate based on much more hp. __________________ E92 M3 \| Space Gray on Fox Red \| M-DCT \| CF Roof \| RAC RG63 Wheels \| Brembo 380mm BBK \| \| Vorsteiner Ti Exhaust \| Matte Black Grilles/Side Gills/Rear Emblem/Mirrors \| \| Alekshop Back up Camera \| GP Thunders \| BMW Aluminum Pedals \| Elite Angels \| \| VentureShield Full Front Wrap \| Hardwired V1 \| Interior Xenon Light Kit \|

10-27-2011, 02:05 AM	#110
red-sauerkraut . Drives: m-car / x-car Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: northern hemisphere Posts: 2,745 iTrader: (0)	With a proper tune, and a few simple tweaks, this motor will make 650hp+ with ease.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search