Quote:
Originally Posted by happyjack
i think the ref established very early on that he was going to "let them play" and the physicality escalated over the course of the match. i agree that hairpulling should be a penalty but the ref isnt going to see every push, tug, and pull on every set piece. i could also argue chelsea's second goal by james shouldnt have been allowed because of the penalty against kulusevski the forced the turnover immediately prior to james's goal.  |
That ref, Taylor, he has a history with Chelsea and is well documented. By the way, what is the purpose of VAR? If Taylor didn't see it, I have a hard time believing none of the other sidelines refs didn't.
How about the fact Havertz was fouled blatantly and it wasn't called and subsequently the Spurs went down the field and scored that first goal? That was a ridiculous non call!
