View Single Post
      10-29-2022, 03:27 AM   #301
M5Rick
General
M5Rick's Avatar
58881
Rep
19,245
Posts

Drives: M5 F10 DCT Gunmetal
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Southern England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
If you had seen the video M3WC is referencing to, one of the major points on which the FIA based the content of their ABA, is that they are convinced that RB was not trying to overspend and that it's all a result of different interpretations of certain costs.
So there's more to it.
Reading the brit press in the Express this morning that 'fans are outraged with Fia at RB penalty'. Me thinking that indeed Fia totally put their foot in it with the ridiculously monster fine (to line their own spend spend coffers) and reduction in wind tunnel time on RBR but no, the paper is referring to fans thinking it's a weak penalty against the team.
Where does the Express get their idea what 'fans' think...ah yes making up mostly their main F1 headings of what HAM is thinking and doing skipping RB's race wins and better strats for the race.
I've finished with the brit press reporting on F1 as from now.
Appreciate 2
GuidoK10473.00