View Single Post
      04-24-2012, 01:42 AM   #63
TurboBimmer
Lieutenant Colonel
TurboBimmer's Avatar
Luxembourg
79
Rep
1,618
Posts

Drives: F82 M4
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Luxembourg

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by catpat8000 View Post
Totally agree. But why assume the automaker went to all the trouble of setting up a special car for the test? Isn't the simpler bet that the magazine's dyno numbers and the magazine's conversion to from wheel HP to flywheel HP are just plain wrong?

That seems far more likely to me.
Maha dynos are known to be very accurate though. Why would the dyno be wrong for just two of the test cars? And the heaviest car in the test with the least power performs best...?

Same thing applies to suspension settings. 99% of the cars (which are all supplied by the manufacturers) tested by SportAuto are out-of-spec (mostly more camber which directly increases grip in cornering). It's just ridiculous.
__________________
Performance Seats, Exhaust, Splitters, Pedals, Steering Wheel / RB Turbos / M3 CF Roof / Brembo GT BBK 355/345 / Rollcage / Forge FMIC / Quaife LSD / Öhlins Road & Track / M3 Suspension Parts / Solid Subframe Bushings / Vorshlag Camberplates / Megan Racing Toe Links / LeatherZ Gauges / Extended M3 DCT Paddles / ER Sports OC / AR OC / Aux Radiator / AR DPs / Alpina TCU / COBB Pro-Tune
Appreciate 0