|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-23-2011, 10:06 PM | #89 |
Avid enthusiast... is to put lightly!!
0
Rep 44
Posts |
You guys say "stock motor", like this is a boosted Civic!? Seriously, from an engineering standpoint these engines are Top Tier, even if the car (as a whole) is not!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-23-2011, 11:33 PM | #90 | |
.
873
Rep 3,992
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 12:30 PM | #91 | |
Captain
283
Rep 883
Posts |
Yes I know that but too much psi and the gas will self-ignite... so what's the psi range of gasoline engine before self-ignition
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 01:51 PM | #92 | |
Grease Monkey
301
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 01:55 PM | #93 |
Grease Monkey
301
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
Guys please keep in mind that with the complex electronic boost control that this engine is using 22 PSI would only be the peak number and would not mean it will run it through the entire RPM range. The computer is always going to be manipulating the wastegate to make that nice smooth power and torque curve.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 02:01 PM | #94 |
Grease Monkey
301
Rep 2,646
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3,1994 Euro E36 M3/4
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada
|
I see it says 22 PSI absolute. So it will make ~ 8.5 PSI atmospheric.
*I apologize for the multiple posts, I am on my IPhone and can't edit my posts in the app. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 04:02 PM | #95 |
Avid enthusiast... is to put lightly!!
0
Rep 44
Posts |
Octane is the measurement of a fuels ability to resist burning or igniting. The higher the octane, the higher its resistance. USDM ratings for these engines are calculated using 91 octane fuel. If you are using higher than that (93 here in S.Florida), then you are giving yourself more of a cushion than they even calculated for. IE; its safer! The engine has the ability to make more power on 93 than 91 octane, as the burn is more controllable!
Using direct injection (HDI/DI) effectively increases the octane rating of the fuel supply. It doesnt eliminate the possibility of pre/post ignition, but Its far more efficient than port fuel injection, in more ways than one! Besides... 22psi, is not being pumped at idle. Thats not even possible on a conventional turbocharger setup. You only see numbers in that level per rpm in heavy duty diesel trucks. Either way... I have seen seen vehicle running 24 psi/g on 93 octane pump gas, on lesser vehicles. There is nothing to worry about here... BMW is not giving arbitrary information here! That 22 psi could be at an average "cruising" output, or it could be a "PEAK" value! I won't know definitively for another few months! |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 05:32 PM | #96 |
Banned
61
Rep 908
Posts
Drives: em-funf
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2000 E39 M5 - current [0.00]
2007 E92 335i - SOLD [0.00] 1996 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] 2000 E39 M5-SOLD [0.00] 2001 E46 M3-SOLD [0.00] 1995 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] |
Same block, same exact dimensions, same turbos, same torque, 5hp more.
In other words this if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck well then maybe it is a .... V10>V8TT they could have at least attempted to add 50hp over X5M. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-24-2011, 11:29 PM | #97 | |
Not a BMW Insider
14
Rep 302
Posts |
Quote:
Based on this, I think a three conventional turbo is more feasible, and therefore more likely, on a six cylinder engine. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2011, 10:49 AM | #98 |
Avid enthusiast... is to put lightly!!
0
Rep 44
Posts |
Its on their agenda now. You're thinking to much about physical pairing of cylinders to inputs on the turbos flange. Its about keeping the exhaust pulses from the engines separate cylinders from interfering with one another. To be Specific: paired cylinders that fire at the same time. You could have 2 paired cylinders firing at once into the two separate scroll inputs, and the third can fire into the next input, which ever being the most efficient. They are currently even putting a twin scroll on a 3 cylinder, in addition to 2 twins on a 6. Besides... BMW doesn't understand the term "OVER ENGINEER"!
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2011, 10:42 PM | #99 |
Lieutenant Colonel
82
Rep 1,656
Posts |
This car has some serious power. All of that comes with much better gas mileage and lower emissions. Ok so it does not rev as high as the recent M cars. But other then that it is a gem of an engine
__________________
nickname"BAD 3",MHD E85 tune,RennArt catback non-resonated exhaust,VRSF Downpipes, VRSF 7"FMIC,VRSF stock side inlets,SSQV BOV,ECS CP,M-performance alcantara steering,retrofit M3 paddle shifters,Alpina B3 tranny flash,AFE power seal CAI,LED angels,ST Coilovers,M3 upper/lower control arms,E93 M3 Front Swaybar ,235/35/19x9 ,275/30/19x9.5. M sport bumpers, CF diffuser. When in doubt..flat out.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2011, 10:50 PM | #100 |
Lieutenant Colonel
82
Rep 1,656
Posts |
What makes you say that. The V8TT is not more powerful then the V10.
Going by this then the BMW legendary formula one turbo 4 cylinder making 850hp must not impress you much. The turbo vs NA. argument is getting old.
__________________
nickname"BAD 3",MHD E85 tune,RennArt catback non-resonated exhaust,VRSF Downpipes, VRSF 7"FMIC,VRSF stock side inlets,SSQV BOV,ECS CP,M-performance alcantara steering,retrofit M3 paddle shifters,Alpina B3 tranny flash,AFE power seal CAI,LED angels,ST Coilovers,M3 upper/lower control arms,E93 M3 Front Swaybar ,235/35/19x9 ,275/30/19x9.5. M sport bumpers, CF diffuser. When in doubt..flat out.
Last edited by Kayani_1; 06-27-2011 at 03:42 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2011, 02:30 PM | #101 |
Banned
61
Rep 908
Posts
Drives: em-funf
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2000 E39 M5 - current [0.00]
2007 E92 335i - SOLD [0.00] 1996 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] 2000 E39 M5-SOLD [0.00] 2001 E46 M3-SOLD [0.00] 1995 E36 M3-SOLD [0.00] |
^might want review what < and > mean. reading is fundamental.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 11:03 AM | #102 |
Major General
7894
Rep 7,266
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 11:15 AM | #103 | |
Major General
7894
Rep 7,266
Posts |
Quote:
Self detonation,as was said, is not only about manifold air pressure. You can have self-ignition in a naturally-aspirated engine. It's all about the heat of the fuel, and the fuel igniting from temperature vs. spark. Temperature can change with increased intake air temp, increased fuel-air ratio, changes in compression ratio, changes in manifold pressure, etc. There is just too much going on to look at one component - otherwise anyone could tune an engine. Take this gross oversimplification with a grain of salt, but it will help you to unerstand: the engine is a pump. The greater volume of fuel/air mix it can pump through at a given rate, the more power it can make. Now, you can increase that pumping rate several ways: 1. Speed up the pump. 2. Increase density of fuel / air mix (i.e. more fuel / air per given work cycle of the pump). 3. Increase the physical capacity of the pump. #1 is accomplished by simply adding more RPM. Obviously there is a limit to how fast all the whirly bits can spin around without coming apart. #2 is accomplished by forced induction. Supercharging and turbocharging (really exhaust-driven supercharger to be correct) increase the density of the fuel / air mix in a given volume of intake gas by compressing it. Therefore as the engine moves it's fixed volume of gas per cycle, more fuel / air mix is passed through. #3 is a fancy way of saying increasing displacement of the engine. Now, there are a lot of factors that influence design decisions. One example is bore vs. stroke, which will dictate the usable RPM range and the torque characteristics coming off the engine. That's why a ship diesel has connecting rods the length of a broom handle and an F1 car's is the length of a toothpick. There are literally hundreds of other parameters that will influence the design and the outcome. ' Hope this helps! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 01:26 PM | #104 | |
Not a BMW Insider
14
Rep 302
Posts |
Quote:
I wonder if this could be accomplished using a simple "gate". In other words, every time a cylinder fires, it switches the gate to the other scroll. Illustration: |/| |\| |/| ^->^->^ lol, I suck. I'm not sure that illustration helps at all. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 05:36 PM | #105 | |
Avid enthusiast... is to put lightly!!
0
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2011, 10:43 PM | #106 |
Brigadier General
197
Rep 4,848
Posts |
What everyone is missing is the tail end of the power curve between the S63 and the S63Tu. The former drops like all turbo does, while the later stays flat. They have managed to stretch the redline from 6800 to 7200, while maintaining the same torque to the redline. That's where the extra psi has gone into --> makes it able to maintain power right to the redline at 7200. Graph on the right is the X5m torque curve.
__________________
Macan S Diesel - Carrera White
Macan Turbo - White 1///M - Valencia Orange Last edited by sparoz; 06-28-2011 at 10:53 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-30-2011, 08:15 PM | #107 | |
Avid enthusiast... is to put lightly!!
0
Rep 44
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2011, 11:11 PM | #108 |
Colonel
1105
Rep 2,286
Posts |
I've also heard from a reliable source as well that BMW itself has dyno'd the F10 M5 at 560 whp...
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-18-2011, 11:55 PM | #109 |
Captain
38
Rep 910
Posts |
So are you saying that it's actually putting down around 660 cHp?
__________________
E90 M3: Some cool stuff...more to come
Ducati 1199 Panigale: Bucket full of mods |
Appreciate
0
|
07-19-2011, 10:46 PM | #110 |
Colonel
1105
Rep 2,286
Posts |
Assuming that what I heard was accurate, and depending upon what % drivetrain loss one uses as an assumption, the crankshaft horsepower would probably be somewhere near that range.
Again, I am simply repeating what was told to me by what appears to be someone with much more information as compared to what the general public would have through the internet or other publicly-available sources. Then again, my source could certainly be mistaken... guess we really wont know until people start to dyno their stock F10 M5's!!! |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|