12-06-2011, 10:06 AM | #1 |
Administrator
40976
Rep 21,240
Posts |
Drag Race Video: F10 M5 vs Panamera S vs E63 vs XFR
BIMMERPOST NEWS Drag Race Video: F10 M5 vs Panamera S vs E63 vs XFR EVO has gathered the brutes of the executive sedan category - the F10 M5, Porsche Panamera S, E63 AMG w/ performance package, and Jaguar XFR, and gathered them for a group test. To whet our appetite for their full review, they've released a drag race clip featuring all four cars. For reference, the cars feature: M5 - 560hp / 501 lb-ft tq (4.4L turbo V8) Panamera S - 400hp / 369 ft-lbs tq (4.8L V8) E63 AMG w/ performance package - 550hp / 590lbft (5.5L V8) XFR - 510hp / 461 ft-lbs tq (5.0L V8) Drag results in the video! |
12-06-2011, 01:44 PM | #4 |
Been There, Done That.
656
Rep 4,728
Posts |
Here's the full article:
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:29 PM | #9 |
Colonel
83
Rep 2,291
Posts |
Very nice win by the M5 but let's remember the Porsche only lost because of its price and it was the only NA contender in this race.
A Panamera Turbo would have mowed this competition; a Turbo S would have slaughtered it.
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:31 PM | #10 |
First Lieutenant
3
Rep 398
Posts |
yeah but its ugly.
__________________
BMW= |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:32 PM | #11 |
Master of Disaster
33
Rep 136
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:32 PM | #12 |
Colonel
83
Rep 2,291
Posts |
This is true but the interior quality of materials makes its competition look like civics (BMW included).
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:50 PM | #13 | |
Captain
228
Rep 876
Posts |
thanks HotIce.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 03:59 PM | #14 |
Brigadier General
3829
Rep 4,667
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Does the M Drivers Package do anything in terms of performance or does it just allow the M5 to reach 190mph+?
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 04:01 PM | #15 | |
Captain
196
Rep 657
Posts |
Quote:
So I wouldnt use the word slaughter. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 04:06 PM | #17 |
Colonel
83
Rep 2,291
Posts |
I don't know; the Panamera is AWD... off the line it should leave those other three. I would still get the M5 solely on a excellent all together package including great looks.
__________________
2jZ + RB26 + 4G63 + LS9 + N54 =
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 04:08 PM | #19 |
Savoir Faire
74
Rep 1,772
Posts |
M5 spanked them on the drag and track. What more can we ask for? Except for an option to remove the active sound. What if the owner wants an aftermarket exhaust? The cabin will sound the exact same!!
__________________
Current: Alpine White F10 M5|H&R springs|12mm/10mm spacers|Eisenmann Race
Sold:Imola Yellow RS4-KW V3|MTM 10mm spacers|Hotchkis rear sway bar|APR Stage 1|Milltek Catless|RNS-E|Euro RS4 Flat bottom Steering Wheel Sold:E46 323i |
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 04:09 PM | #20 | |
Colonel
121
Rep 2,023
Posts |
Quote:
And as others said its stupid ugly. So |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2011, 04:21 PM | #22 | |
Private
3
Rep 84
Posts |
Quote:
I didn't read the whole article but if I'm reading the this chart right, it looks like the m5 would come from behind. LAP TIMES Performance Panamera QP XFR 0-30 1.4 2 2.1 0-40 2 2.9 2.9 0-50 2.6 4 3.8 0-60 3.6 5.1 4.8 0-70 4.7 6.7 5.9 0-80 5.8 8.3 7.3 0-90 7.3 10.2 8.9 0-100 8.9 12.1 10.2 0-110 10.7 14.8 12.3 0-120 12.9 17.9 14.5 0-130 15.6 21.4 17 0-14018.8 -- 20.3 0-15022.7 -- 24.5 1/4 mile sec 12 13.6 13 1/4 mile mph 116.3 105.9 113 Braking 0-100 sec 4.6 4.3 4.5 Braking 0-100 ft 304 319.4 309.3 0-100-0 sec 14.2 16.9 15.3 2009 article. If 2012 Pcar has HP bump, then maybe it's as fast now. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|