M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > M5 versus...

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-16-2012, 11:05 AM   #67
ultimateendz
Vengeance is mine, I shall repay
ultimateendz's Avatar
United_States
132
Rep
4,656
Posts

Drives: X3, CTS-V coupe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcao View Post
Sure man whatever you say.. at the end of the day, it is still a CADDY
yup your right...and i still love my american car
__________________
Project: Vengeance[ACM's King of domestics, STOCK:501whp 489wtq | 2.9L whipple stock bottom end: 706whp 688wtq] Callies Compstar motor build:NEXT
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2012, 11:13 AM   #68
sparkyg
Brigadier General
sparkyg's Avatar
142
Rep
3,523
Posts

Drives: A6 Allroad
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oil Country

iTrader: (5)

Appreciate 0
      03-16-2012, 11:58 AM   #69
US///M3
Banned
98
Rep
1,265
Posts

Drives: 1973 Jensen Interceptor
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shanghai, People's Republic of China

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapezzul View Post
Not many cross shop the Panamera Turbo S ($100K more than an M5 so you could buy two M5s and a track rat) but people will cross shop the CTS-V and M5. It is was more like $20K difference if that- CTS-V is around $67k and the M5 has been around $85k. GM is lucky to share development costs with the Corvette keeping the Vs a good value.
Im talkin about about the Panamera turbo, not turbo s. Your loaded CTS-V is around 63 grand, your loaded M5 will be around 97. Please dont tell us both cars cost about the same.

Regardless,why then did autobild compare the Corvette Z06 to the more expensive Porsche 911 Turbo S?
There's at least a $80k between both cars...
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2012, 01:29 PM   #70
mapezzul
Special Agent
mapezzul's Avatar
United_States
74
Rep
1,731
Posts

Drives: Depends on the day!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bavaria

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by US///M3 View Post
Im talkin about about the Panamera turbo, not turbo s. Your loaded CTS-V is around 63 grand, your loaded M5 will be around 97. Please dont tell us both cars cost about the same.

Regardless,why then did autobild compare the Corvette Z06 to the more expensive Porsche 911 Turbo S?
There's at least a $80k between both cars...
Not wasting my time discussing something with an individual that can't even look over at the Caddy website and built a loaded CTS-V for $74K or a base one for $64k. Or understand that Autobild did that because those cars are performance competitors as well as cross shopped cars for different reasons than money.... to show how much bang for the buck the 'vette is (and in EU it is not as cheap as stateside where Germany is).
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2012, 02:00 PM   #71
US///M3
Banned
98
Rep
1,265
Posts

Drives: 1973 Jensen Interceptor
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Shanghai, People's Republic of China

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapezzul View Post
Not wasting my time discussing something with an individual that can't even look over at the Caddy website and built a loaded CTS-V for $74K or a base one for $64k. Or understand that Autobild did that because those cars are performance competitors as well as cross shopped cars for different reasons than money.... to show how much bang for the buck the 'vette is (and in EU it is not as cheap as stateside where Germany is).
How much is a Base f10 m5 is In Germany?


Bottom line the Porsche Panamera Turbo or Turbo S will spank the f10 M5 and it wasnt inckuded because it's too expensive according to you.

Then the Nissan GT-R bein part of camparos including cars that cost twice as much really makes sense.

Last edited by US///M3; 03-16-2012 at 03:49 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-17-2012, 04:52 AM   #72
Bimmernerd
Second Lieutenant
Bimmernerd's Avatar
Sweden
6
Rep
242
Posts

Drives: 530dM xDrive F11 2012
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stockholm

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by US///M3
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapezzul View Post
Not wasting my time discussing something with an individual that can't even look over at the Caddy website and built a loaded CTS-V for $74K or a base one for $64k. Or understand that Autobild did that because those cars are performance competitors as well as cross shopped cars for different reasons than money.... to show how much bang for the buck the 'vette is (and in EU it is not as cheap as stateside where Germany is).
How much is a Base f10 m5 is In Germany?


Bottom line the Porsche Panamera Turbo or Turbo S will spank the f10 M5 and it wasnt inckuded because it's too expensive according to you.

Then the Nissan GT-R bein part of camparos including cars that cost twice as much really makes sense.
This is getting pretty lame...no the Panamera Turbo does not beat the M5 0-60 or on the ring, you need the turbo S-toad to do that...
Appreciate 0
      03-17-2012, 06:20 AM   #73
Anderw
Brigadier General
Anderw's Avatar
United_States
659
Rep
3,320
Posts

Drives: F80 m3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: FL

iTrader: (12)

F10 is the ish
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 09:45 PM   #74
mainly
Lieutenant
Canada
41
Rep
567
Posts

Drives: 991 GT3, '12 CLS63 Kleemann K3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by grimlock View Post
How to be #1 -omit the cars that beat it.
I see the both the Panamera Turbo and Turbo S beat it in lap time and 0-100kmh.
E63P was launched at 1800rpm and M5 with launch control - not exactly fair.
And the M5 is the only car with the latest tires (PSS).
absolutely, the panamara turbo/s creams the m5, and sure its more money, but why do they always retort with that?

so what? panamara turbo and m5 are the same class of vehicle: 4 door performance sedan, the Porsche is just better. accept it.

and the 63 amg's especially the cls63 ARE right there with the m5 in every category except maybe handling.
the cls63 has recorded 11.9 1/4 mile times and 3.7 sec 0-60 times. same as m5.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 09:46 PM   #75
mainly
Lieutenant
Canada
41
Rep
567
Posts

Drives: 991 GT3, '12 CLS63 Kleemann K3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmernerd View Post
This is getting pretty lame...no the Panamera Turbo does not beat the M5 0-60 or on the ring, you need the turbo S-toad to do that...
uh, you need to research a bit more. the p turbo is faster than the m5 0-60
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 10:31 PM   #76
Bimmernerd
Second Lieutenant
Bimmernerd's Avatar
Sweden
6
Rep
242
Posts

Drives: 530dM xDrive F11 2012
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stockholm

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mainly
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmernerd View Post
This is getting pretty lame...no the Panamera Turbo does not beat the M5 0-60 or on the ring, you need the turbo S-toad to do that...
uh, you need to research a bit more. the p turbo is faster than the m5 0-60
Correction, my fault! The M5 (F10) is faster on the Nordschleife than the Turbo-toad...not 0-60...

Source: fastestlaps.com

Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST