M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > M5 versus...

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-14-2014, 09:50 AM   #67
wrsbmw
Major
wrsbmw's Avatar
108
Rep
1,027
Posts

Drives: 2018 Ferrari 488 Spider
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, Tx

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Careful Driver View Post
That's true. Porsche is a poor man's exotic car. I completely agree with that statement.
A poor man's exotic? LOLOLOLOL!

A poor man can't buy a 911 much less a boxster.
Appreciate 0
      06-14-2014, 12:27 PM   #68
bm323
Captain
194
Rep
850
Posts

Drives: 12.2 E92 M3 ZCP; 12.7 C63
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Did you see my post above, where I quoted the official 0-1000m (or standing kilometer as it's also called) times?

The M5 and M3/4 DCT has exactly the same 0-1000m time at 21,9s. The F10 M5 does around 150MPH at the 1000m mark, so it seems there won't be that much between them, even from 80MPH up...

At 0-100 (MPH?) the M3/4 DCT will definitely be close, since they actually are crossing the 1000m (1km) mark at around 150MPH at exactly the same time
You probably have not checked out sport auto tests, (and if I'm correct as I don't understand German,) the following links show that the F80 is as quick as the F10 M5 up to 100kmph, but will then lose out after that do check out the links

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...95.html?show=3

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...86.html?show=3

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=2

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=997051

Last edited by bm323; 06-14-2014 at 12:35 PM..
Appreciate 0
      06-14-2014, 12:38 PM   #69
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1718
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bm323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Did you see my post above, where I quoted the official 0-1000m (or standing kilometer as it's also called) times?

The M5 and M3/4 DCT has exactly the same 0-1000m time at 21,9s. The F10 M5 does around 150MPH at the 1000m mark, so it seems there won't be that much between them, even from 80MPH up...

At 0-100 (MPH?) the M3/4 DCT will definitely be close, since they actually are crossing the 1000m (1km) mark at around 150MPH at exactly the same time
You probably have not checked out sport auto tests, (and if I'm correct as I don't understand German,) the following links show that the F80 is as quick as the F10 M5 up to 100kmph, but will then lose out after that do check out the links

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...95.html?show=3" rel="" target="_blank">http://<a href="http://www.sportauto...tml?show=3</a>

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...86.html?show=3" rel="" target="_blank">http://<a href="http://www.sportauto...tml?show=3</a>

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4" rel="" target="_blank">http://<a href="http://www.sportauto...tml?show=4</a>

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=2" rel="" target="_blank">http://<a href="http://www.sportauto...tml?show=2</a>

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=997051" rel="" target="_blank">http://<a href="http://f80.bimmerpos...p?t=997051</a>
My post was from way before we had test data for the F8x.

The only comparable stats was manufacturer data for both cars.

BTW, I have referred to all of those Sport Auto tests several times and have written several posts in the F8x thread you linked to.
Appreciate 0
      06-14-2014, 01:03 PM   #70
Careful Driver
Banned
10
Rep
110
Posts

Drives: F10 M5
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

So the F10 M5 CP will lap hockenheim same as a F80 M3 (1:12,8)? That's just ridiculously good for the M5.

I'm pretty sure the nurburgring time for the M5 is at least 5 seconds better with the CP car as well. I'm surprised sport auto didn't do that test yet.
Appreciate 0
      06-14-2014, 01:44 PM   #71
RPiM5
Major General
RPiM5's Avatar
2873
Rep
7,885
Posts

Drives: Black M5
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth 616

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335iRlz View Post
I didn't it started raining lol I sat inside the house and played ps4.
Yeah it was raining a lot last night.
__________________


Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 03:46 AM   #72
bm323
Captain
194
Rep
850
Posts

Drives: 12.2 E92 M3 ZCP; 12.7 C63
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sg

iTrader: (0)

If the sportauto results in the following link are as tested and I'm guessing (German) correctly, the M5 comp is also more elastic 80 to 100 and 80 to 120

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...86.html?show=4

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=998419

Does anyone have the same sportauto tests for the M5 non comp?
Appreciate 0
      06-16-2014, 01:32 PM   #73
Nkbm82
Private First Class
Nkbm82's Avatar
74
Rep
196
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW 750i
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Newport Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

I'm betting the M3/M4 are faster.

http://www.carbuzz.com/news/2014/6/1...eview-7720803/
Appreciate 0
      06-16-2014, 01:38 PM   #74
JOHNBMWM5
Live for today tomorrow never comes
JOHNBMWM5's Avatar
United Kingdom
1989
Rep
9,498
Posts

Drives: 2022 LCI Marina Bay Blue/ Smok
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

I am test driving the new M3 on Sunday, so all will be revealed then.
Not expecting too much from it.
__________________
Live for now, life is too short.
2021 LCI M5 Marina Bay Blue/ Smoked White Leather
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 02:22 AM   #75
Maddict3
Major
Maddict3's Avatar
192
Rep
1,292
Posts

Drives: 2015 991 GT3
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Miami

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by clar View Post
Calling something a "poor man's xxx" is nothing but bigotry, typically uttered by ego maniacs.
agreed
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 11:22 AM   #76
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1718
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bm323 View Post
You probably have not checked out sport auto tests, (and if I'm correct as I don't understand German,) the following links show that the F80 is as quick as the F10 M5 up to 100kmph, but will then lose out after that do check out the links

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...95.html?show=3

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...86.html?show=3

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=2

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=997051
Quote:
Originally Posted by bm323 View Post
If the sportauto results in the following link are as tested and I'm guessing (German) correctly, the M5 comp is also more elastic 80 to 100 and 80 to 120

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichste...86.html?show=4

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=998419

Does anyone have the same sportauto tests for the M5 non comp?
Here is the non CP M5 supertest:

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4

As you can see, the M4 and M5 are VERY close to 100MPH (not 100km/h):

M4: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,8s
M5: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,7s

So only 1/10th of a second difference from 0-100MPH

As has been said by others here, at high speeds the M5 starts to pull an advantage:

M4: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,7s
M5: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,0s

So from 160-200km/h (100MPH-125MPH) the M5 pulls 0,6s on the M4. Expect that gap to increase after that as well.

BTW, the M4 was only 1/10th of a second quicker to 100km/h (62MPH) than the M5 (4,2 vs 4,3), meaning that no great advantage for the M4 off the line. Impressive that the M4 is as good as similar to 100MPH and only looses 0,6s from 100MPH to 125MPH...
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 12:09 PM   #77
Careful Driver
Banned
10
Rep
110
Posts

Drives: F10 M5
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Here is the non CP M5 supertest:

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4

As you can see, the M4 and M5 are VERY close to 100MPH (not 100km/h):

M4: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,8s
M5: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,7s

So only 1/10th of a second difference from 0-100MPH

As has been said by others here, at high speeds the M5 starts to pull an advantage:

M4: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,7s
M5: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,0s

So from 160-200km/h (100MPH-125MPH) the M5 pulls 0,6s on the M4. Expect that gap to increase after that as well.

BTW, the M4 was only 1/10th of a second quicker to 100km/h (62MPH) than the M5 (4,2 vs 4,3), meaning that no great advantage for the M4 off the line. Impressive that the M4 is as good as similar to 100MPH and only looses 0,6s from 100MPH to 125MPH...
On the same note, disappointing that M4 is not so much faster off the line than the M5 and very interesting to see a 4300 lbs car be just as quick to 100 kmh.

If you did a 60-130 pull, which is to me the most important DD car measure, M5 would probably put 2-3 car lengths on the M4.
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 12:22 PM   #78
SocalBM
First Lieutenant
United_States
179
Rep
348
Posts

Drives: Porsche GT3
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Don't suppose you guys have seen this yet?

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=998857

In a nut-shell: 420rwhp stock, up to 480rwhp on a 2 day, hack-job tune, nothing optimized.
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 01:05 PM   #79
M6-Coupe
Major General
M6-Coupe's Avatar
1125
Rep
6,067
Posts

Drives: F92 M8
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay area

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SocalBM View Post
Don't suppose you guys have seen this yet?

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=998857

In a nut-shell: 420rwhp stock, up to 480rwhp on a 2 day, hack-job tune, nothing optimized.
and his dyno result shows 566 whp for stock M5
http://f10.m5post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=998959
__________________
Current : 2020 F92 Black Sapphire M8 - ZF8
Gone : 2018 F80 Mineral Gray M3 - 6MT
Gone : 2016 F82 Austin Yellow M4 - 6MT
Gone : 2013 F13 Sakhir Orange M6 -7DCT
Gone: 2013 F13 Alpine White 650i -ZF8
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 01:18 PM   #80
SocalBM
First Lieutenant
United_States
179
Rep
348
Posts

Drives: Porsche GT3
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Houston

iTrader: (0)

Yeah, I was actually quite disappointed to hear those were the numbers for the M3. I doesn't need to be that powerful to be fun (and fun is what it's all about) yet everyone on the M3 board wants nothing short of 500whp...
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 10:25 PM   #81
bm323
Captain
194
Rep
850
Posts

Drives: 12.2 E92 M3 ZCP; 12.7 C63
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Here is the non CP M5 supertest:

http://www.sportauto.de/supertest/bm...95.html?show=4

As you can see, the M4 and M5 are VERY close to 100MPH (not 100km/h):

M4: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,8s
M5: 0-160km/h (or 100MPH) - 8,7s

So only 1/10th of a second difference from 0-100MPH

As has been said by others here, at high speeds the M5 starts to pull an advantage:

M4: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,7s
M5: 0-200km/h (or 125MPH) - 13,0s

So from 160-200km/h (100MPH-125MPH) the M5 pulls 0,6s on the M4. Expect that gap to increase after that as well.

BTW, the M4 was only 1/10th of a second quicker to 100km/h (62MPH) than the M5 (4,2 vs 4,3), meaning that no great advantage for the M4 off the line. Impressive that the M4 is as good as similar to 100MPH and only looses 0,6s from 100MPH to 125MPH...
Yes, thanks for the info. The M3 M4 are solidly good sport sedans, and I didn't initially expect them to match the F10 M5 in a straight line. What I don't understand however is that the M5 Sportauto lap time (one of them) is similar to the M3/4 on the Hockenheim, but substantially slower on the Nurburgring. Any reason for this (other than my view that Sportauto one lap time isn't fully reliable )?
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 03:57 AM   #82
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1718
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bm323 View Post
Yes, thanks for the info. The M3 M4 are solidly good sport sedans, and I didn't initially expect them to match the F10 M5 in a straight line. What I don't understand however is that the M5 Sportauto lap time (one of them) is similar to the M3/4 on the Hockenheim, but substantially slower on the Nurburgring. Any reason for this (other than my view that Sportauto one lap time isn't fully reliable )?
Good question.

Horst von Saurma said that the Nurburgring lap was only driven at approximately 80% of the capabilities of the car (to avoid accidents and due to little time in the car etc). But that in that last 20% was perhaps 80% of the cars capabilities in some cases.
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 11:46 AM   #83
bm323
Captain
194
Rep
850
Posts

Drives: 12.2 E92 M3 ZCP; 12.7 C63
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sg

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Good question.

Horst von Saurma said that the Nurburgring lap was only driven at approximately 80% of the capabilities of the car (to avoid accidents and due to little time in the car etc). But that in that last 20% was perhaps 80% of the cars capabilities in some cases.
Sorry, do you mean that Sportauto reported that the 8:05 timing was at 80% of the M5's capability?
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 12:31 PM   #84
Boss330
Major General
Boss330's Avatar
No_Country
1718
Rep
5,110
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bm323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
Good question.

Horst von Saurma said that the Nurburgring lap was only driven at approximately 80% of the capabilities of the car (to avoid accidents and due to little time in the car etc). But that in that last 20% was perhaps 80% of the cars capabilities in some cases.
Sorry, do you mean that Sportauto reported that the 8:05 timing was at 80% of the M5's capability?
No, he said that any Supertest lap was driven at around 80% of what the car could do.

I posted this interview with HvS over on the M4 boards (in the M4 Supertest thread):

http://www.pistonheads.com/news/defa...?storyId=30067
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 01:13 PM   #85
RPiM5
Major General
RPiM5's Avatar
2873
Rep
7,885
Posts

Drives: Black M5
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth 616

iTrader: (0)

Boss I drove the F80 M3 yesterday. It pulls damn hard in the straightline but honestly there's no way it's faster than even a non-Comp Pack F10 M5 both from 0-60 and from 60-130. On the track, it'll whoop the M5 for sure though.

When do you get here anyways?! Looking forward to your visit.
__________________


Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 01:25 PM   #86
TC M3
Captain
TC M3's Avatar
United_States
96
Rep
754
Posts

Drives: 991TTS,458italia, '14RR Ghost
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miami, FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335iRlz View Post
and a porsche is a poor mans exotic I don't know anyone who would compare the new m3/m4 to the top tier 911s.
LOLOL
__________________
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 02:38 PM   #87
Careful Driver
Banned
10
Rep
110
Posts

Drives: F10 M5
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RPiM5 View Post
Boss I drove the F80 M3 yesterday. It pulls damn hard in the straightline but honestly there's no way it's faster than even a non-Comp Pack F10 M5 both from 0-60 and from 60-130. On the track, it'll whoop the M5 for sure though.

When do you get here anyways?! Looking forward to your visit.
I am getting really confused about how fast this car is. I see all these people saying its damn fast and pulls so much "like the m5", but then they say M5 is faster. M5 isnt really THAT fast to begin with, in other words it doesnt do 0-60 in 3.2s. If its not as fast as the M5, then its not really fast in my book.

Is it because people are being nice about the new m3 and dont want to put it down or is it because they cant accept it being faster than the 40k more expensive car

And how the 6 cylinder sounds better inside the cabin then the CP V8 in M5 is beyond me. Windows down, m5 should destroy the tin can, if it doesnt, then the active sound in m3 is a lot more than 2-3%
Appreciate 0
      06-18-2014, 02:42 PM   #88
JOHNBMWM5
Live for today tomorrow never comes
JOHNBMWM5's Avatar
United Kingdom
1989
Rep
9,498
Posts

Drives: 2022 LCI Marina Bay Blue/ Smok
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Careful Driver View Post
I am getting really confused about how fast this car is. I see all these people saying its damn fast and pulls so much "like the m5", but then they say M5 is faster. M5 isnt really THAT fast to begin with, in other words it doesnt do 0-60 in 3.2s. If its not as fast as the M5, then its not really fast in my book.

Is it because people are being nice about the new m3 and dont want to put it down or is it because they cant accept it being faster than the 40k more expensive car

And how the 6 cylinder sounds better inside the cabin then the CP V8 in M5 is beyond me. Windows down, m5 should destroy the tin can, if it doesnt, then the active sound in m3 is a lot more than 2-3%
I am test driving the M3 Sunday
Will be getting out of the M5 straight into it so will give my take on it then.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST