09-14-2018, 07:01 AM | #23 |
Lieutenant Colonel
810
Rep 1,847
Posts |
Are all of your numbers wheel horse power?
I am confused as when I look at a standard M5 in the UK the Torque is 525ft/lbs with the BHP showing around 580bhp but on your graph for a standard car is 525ft/lbs and 525bhp which I assume is WHP It looks like yours is torque at the crank but bhp at the wheels which is odd. Can you advise Also what's the safe limit on the gearbox as I thought it was 550ft/lbs but the increase now goes above this to nearly 600, again is that wheels or crank Thanks Last edited by OneExtra; 09-14-2018 at 09:01 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-17-2018, 03:26 PM | #25 | |
1736
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
There is no general consensus on what the max safe torque limit is for the transmission. But we like to keep things reasonable (under 600lb-ft at the wheels) since this improves drivability and top end power. |
|
Appreciate
1
OneExtra809.50 |
09-23-2018, 04:27 PM | #28 |
Second Lieutenant
65
Rep 229
Posts |
I raced my friends 2016 C63s yesterday and he didn't stand a chance. C63s had no cats and full exhaust.
2nd 3rd gear pulls multiple times and I was pulling away by 4 5 car lengths and still pulling away easy. Best part?? Everyone of our friends thought his car was faster lol Just cause its loud, doesnt mean its fast!! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-23-2018, 04:38 PM | #29 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
810
Rep 1,847
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2018, 04:28 PM | #31 |
Private
13
Rep 84
Posts |
Do you feel safe running the 93 map with the octane booster? From everything I've heard/seen about the octane booster is that they don't work, granted it's been a few years since I really researched it but I just didn't think it worked. Does openflash advise using it to run the 93 map?
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2018, 05:14 PM | #32 | |
Second Lieutenant
65
Rep 229
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Somy6; 09-25-2018 at 05:21 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2018, 06:11 PM | #33 | |
1736
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2018, 11:43 PM | #34 | ||
Private
13
Rep 84
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2018, 11:58 PM | #36 |
1736
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Yes the difference is very noticeable between the 91oct and 93oct tunes
|
Appreciate
1
ByronUT_M612.50 |
10-04-2018, 03:48 PM | #37 |
First Lieutenant
17
Rep 305
Posts |
What do you guys think about adding 3 gallons of E85 with the rest 91, which calculates to 93 octane, with the stage 1.1 93 oct maps? Or better to have a dedicated e30ish+91 map with adjusted scalars?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-04-2018, 05:26 PM | #38 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
24082
Rep 190,597
Posts |
Sub'd
__________________
Check out our current sale by clicking on this link!
https://x-ph.com/sale/ Phone number 702-494-9435 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-24-2018, 12:11 AM | #39 |
Private
13
Rep 82
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|