09-18-2014, 04:14 PM | #23 |
Colonel
273
Rep 2,664
Posts
Drives: Goggomobil
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kangaroo land
|
May be it's true ... I think the current /// line up is lacking a bit of soul
__________________
F86 X6///
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 04:21 PM | #25 |
Colonel
314
Rep 2,448
Posts |
I'm pretty sure more v8s and v10s are gonna pop up ala the laFerrari & P1 hybrid mode. An EV range of 40miles along with lighter chassis made with carbon fiber should do the trick.
__________________
__________________
Current Bimmer: '16 F80 M3, '20 F87 M2c Gone but never forgotten: '13 FO e92 M3, Swifts, volks/advan, Akra Evo, Kics R40 Past: Alpine white e46 323i, Jet Black e39 530, Saph Black e60 530, Space Grey N54 e92 335, Mineral White N55 e92 335 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 04:22 PM | #26 | |
Private First Class
23
Rep 139
Posts
Drives: E92M3, E60 M5, F10 M5, F85 X5M
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 04:22 PM | #27 |
Captain
356
Rep 928
Posts
Drives: 2007 328i Coupe, ZSP, Premium
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Knoxville
|
Bring back the NA engines. Turbos are so boring.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 04:35 PM | #29 | |
Captain
63
Rep 757
Posts |
Friend
Quote:
Scott 26 I would be surprised if BMW to return with a new V10 engine. I think a V10 engine, instead a great need to provide a new BMW V8 engine displacement or different, lighter and less polluting than 4.4 liters is not necessary. I propose a new 3.8-liter V8 or 4.0-liter twin turbo technology with racing details like a lighter intake manifold, lighter and craft pistons, a more efficient intercooler, and generally more work with innovative parts for that engine . The powers that could be exploited from 450 HP to 650 HP versions M. Ideally, BMW offers the V8 twin-turbo 4.0 lt to compete more directly with M-Benz and Audi already offers an engine with these features. Simple as this is the most optimal levels of a V8 engine are reached. 4.0-liter, spend less oil than a 4.4 or a 4.8 liter is lighter. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 04:36 PM | #30 | |
Brigadier General
1789
Rep 4,216
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2020 F87 M2 Competition /l\ LBB /i\ Executive Package 2013 E70 X5M /l\ Space Grey /i\ Full Silverstone Leather /l\ LED Headlights /i\ Comfort Access /l\ HUD /i\ Ventilated Seats /l\ 22" BBS SV BMW CCA Member |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:03 PM | #34 |
Brigadier General
3817
Rep 4,657
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
|
Highly doubt a N/A V10. BMW put so much emphasis on turbocharging their cars I find it highly unlikely they'll resort back to N/A especially since the current engine is generally praised in it's application. Add the fact that each year, regulations become stricter N/A would be a pipe dream at this point.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:08 PM | #37 |
Major General
10128
Rep 8,607
Posts |
No... reworked s63tu. An NA V10 makes almost no sense in the lineup with its power/tq characteristics. A TTv10... absolutely forget about it.
__________________
2 x N54 -> 1 x N55 -> 1 x S55-> 1 x B58
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:10 PM | #39 | |
Captain
205
Rep 654
Posts |
It would take a lot of balls for BMW to return to a 10-cylinder engine (especially when you have the dips**ts such as Greenpeace, eco-terrorists as well as hippie politicians and anti-car legislators)
But kudos to BMW if they make a 10 cylinder engine happen. But holy sh*t, am I hearing the rumor right? Quote:
Man, it's been years since we last saw something like this..... I WANT THAT M5 STATION WAGON ONCE AGAIN!!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:14 PM | #40 | |
First Lieutenant
123
Rep 353
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:16 PM | #41 |
Major
145
Rep 1,314
Posts
Drives: 2021 X3 M40i, 2018 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NJ
|
I just want the new M5 to be smaller and weigh 500lbs less than it does right now.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:25 PM | #43 |
Major
112
Rep 1,140
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-18-2014, 05:32 PM | #44 |
Captain
151
Rep 842
Posts |
I can see a V10 happening, I could even just about see a naturally aspirated one happen.
Yes turbo-charging is being used now to get the required output vs. economy/emissions, but --- if you put less load on the engine in the first place, then you'll cut the emissions and consumption anyway, and pushing forward with things like project-i is ABSOLUTELY about this idea... a hybrid supplimented system requires less effort from the engine, and lighter body (this will be a G-series engine, not the partially lighter F-series) will require less effort from the engine. The Fleet average required to meet legislation is being maintained by these new smaller three cylinder vehicles so many here like to bitch about. So the next gen M engines can perhaps afford to distance themselves from the core range a little more again. This is the future people, don't judge it by the S85, that tech is probably 20 years old by the time a next-gen V10 hits the market. Will it definitely happen... I don't know, but you have to think that all the development and ground work BMW has been doing with project-i is going to start to pay dividends once this transitional phase is over. E is the past, F is the transitional phase, G is the future... and the future could be a smaller displacement 400hp V10, with 150hp of power on tap from e-motors, in a car that weighs somewhere between an E39 M5 and an E60 M5. As for the X1M, M engineers then I assume will be doing what they can with the UKL platform... interesting. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|