M5POST
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   M5POST - BMW M5 Forum > F10 M5 Forum > BMW M5 (F10) General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-17-2012, 04:58 PM   #1
AlpWhite11
Captain
United_States
40
Rep
695
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Irvine

iTrader: (0)

Send a message via Yahoo to AlpWhite11
CAR Magazine - M5 F10 against E36 AMG and Jaguar XFR

BIMMERPOST
     Featured on BIMMERPOST.com
Can't wait till this hits the US newstands so I can pick up a copy. Car always has the best photos. And the results not so bad here too

Name:  car1.jpg
Views: 15155
Size:  174.2 KB

Name:  car2.jpg
Views: 15325
Size:  257.6 KB

Name:  car3.jpg
Views: 14610
Size:  126.4 KB

Name:  car3a.jpg
Views: 14454
Size:  76.6 KB

Name:  car4.jpg
Views: 14623
Size:  239.5 KB

Name:  car5.jpg
Views: 14493
Size:  132.1 KB

Name:  car6.jpg
Views: 14495
Size:  98.9 KB

Name:  car7.jpg
Views: 14502
Size:  168.2 KB

Name:  car8.jpg
Views: 14675
Size:  213.5 KB

Name:  car9.jpg
Views: 14608
Size:  110.6 KB

Name:  car10.jpg
Views: 14145
Size:  131.6 KB

Name:  car11.jpg
Views: 14043
Size:  58.2 KB

Name:  car12.jpg
Views: 14153
Size:  30.3 KB

Name:  car13.jpg
Views: 14283
Size:  76.8 KB

Name:  car14.jpg
Views: 14237
Size:  352.3 KB

Name:  car15.jpg
Views: 14071
Size:  155.5 KB

Name:  car16.jpg
Views: 14146
Size:  120.9 KB

Name:  car17.jpg
Views: 14023
Size:  132.6 KB

Name:  car18.jpg
Views: 13948
Size:  161.2 KB

Name:  car19.jpg
Views: 13933
Size:  126.9 KB

Name:  car20.jpg
Views: 14040
Size:  119.2 KB

Name:  car21.jpg
Views: 13940
Size:  152.7 KB

Name:  car22.jpg
Views: 13971
Size:  118.8 KB

http://www.**************.com/intern...z-e63-amg.html

Last edited by AlpWhite11; 03-17-2012 at 05:12 PM.
Appreciate 0
      03-17-2012, 05:17 PM   #2
phish_100
First Lieutenant
United Kingdom
3
Rep
300
Posts

Drives: Azurite Black F10M M5
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: London

iTrader: (0)

What a superb review!! Thanks for posting! Long live the King!!
Appreciate 0
      03-17-2012, 06:31 PM   #3
///M5Canuck
Private
0
Rep
89
Posts

Drives: BMW 535i xDrive
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Portland, OR

iTrader: (1)

It seems a bit curious that the BMW dyno'd with 16.5% less power that stated. BMW is generally fairly conservative with their numbers I have experienced. Love the last sentence though; means to me, this is not a car you will likely get bored with.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 04:12 PM   #4
mapezzul
Special Agent
mapezzul's Avatar
United_States
26
Rep
1,737
Posts

Drives: Depends on the day!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bavaria

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M5Canuck View Post
It seems a bit curious that the BMW dyno'd with 16.5% less power that stated. BMW is generally fairly conservative with their numbers I have experienced. Love the last sentence though; means to me, this is not a car you will likely get bored with.
I am curious on those numbers as well- do they just use TOTAL gas or do they change out the oil as well? I have rarely seen a BMW M dyne less than the power it should be... could have been a badly abused press car not properly broken in- but imagine the numbers if it was true powered?
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 04:40 PM   #5
brava09
Captain
brava09's Avatar
22
Rep
817
Posts

Drives: '11 Audi RS5
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Europe

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M5Canuck View Post
It seems a bit curious that the BMW dyno'd with 16.5% less power that stated. BMW is generally fairly conservative with their numbers I have experienced. Love the last sentence though; means to me, this is not a car you will likely get bored with.
It's power at the wheels, which is different than power at flywheel due to drivetrain loss.
__________________
11 Audi RS5 Misano Red
08 E92 M3 Jerez Black 6MT--sold
08 E92 335i 6MT traded in for M3
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 04:49 PM   #6
smashhell
Lieutenant
United_States
10
Rep
490
Posts

Drives: 2011 535i
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by brava09
Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M5Canuck View Post
It seems a bit curious that the BMW dyno'd with 16.5% less power that stated. BMW is generally fairly conservative with their numbers I have experienced. Love the last sentence though; means to me, this is not a car you will likely get bored with.
It's power at the wheels, which is different than power at flywheel due to drivetrain loss.
Yep, it is expected on average of 15% drivetrain loss when dyno at the wheels. So add 15% to the hp is what the engine produces.
__________________
2011 535i Alpine White, Oyster on black interior, Premium 1 & 2 Package, Magnaflow Full Cat-Back Exhaust, JB4 Stage 2
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 05:07 PM   #7
grimlock
Banned
182
Rep
1,860
Posts

Drives: F10 N52B30@255PS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hong Kong

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapezzul View Post
I am curious on those numbers as well- do they just use TOTAL gas or do they change out the oil as well? I have rarely seen a BMW M dyne less than the power it should be... could have been a badly abused press car not properly broken in- but imagine the numbers if it was true powered?
A low-Dyno on a BMW -that's a rarity!
But this is a British mag right?

But the car got a crazy 0-100kmh, 4.32s without launch control. It was 0.65s faster than the E63. And the E63 was showing higher dyno figures (relative to stated) -go figure.

The larger displacement of the E63 cries out for an output boost /tune. Seems more precarious with the M5, you would want to keep it stock, BMW has wrung out a lot performance from the engine already.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 05:32 PM   #8
JagoBmw10
Bavarian Enthusiast
JagoBmw10's Avatar
United_States
1
Rep
126
Posts

Drives: TiAg E90
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

I find it hard to believe a CLS63 is faster around the track than the new f10 M5. Maybe the stig was driving the merc and my grandma was driving the bimmer...

It all makes sense now!
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 05:38 PM   #9
WULFFZA
Lieutenant
WULFFZA's Avatar
United_States
22
Rep
420
Posts

Drives: 2011 E90 335i M-Sport 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

South African CAR Mag was my favourite car publication growing up. My mom still keeps issues for me to read on my annual trips home :-)
I wish I could have my car back there - beautiful scenery, and twisty mountain roads in the Western Cape (where CAR magazine HQ is) or long straight arid Karoo just beyond that, many opportunities to just flog the snot out of it.

Now, why I am happy to stay in the USA:

New M5 price in SA R1,157,000 (incl 14%VAT), thats R1,014,000 excl and at todays exchange, $134,000. US expected price is +-$95,000. So looks like I have to get one, it will never be this cheap :-)

For comparison, my 08 M5 with reasonable miles would be approx $75,000 in SA, again +-33% lower here. Then factor in the gas price - SA about R11 per liter, that's $5.50 per gal.

So my car would have cost $75,000 and it would cost me $90 to fill up (and go 200miles..)
__________________
2011 E90 335i M-Sport 6MT Alpine white - saddle brown
2005 Toyota 4Runner 4WD Sport Edition Silver
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 05:42 PM   #10
Mako
2000 M Roadster (sold), 2006 M Coupe (sold)
United_States
90
Rep
1,583
Posts

Drives: '12 X3 35i M Spt '13 335 M Spt
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chicago suburbs

iTrader: (0)

I would trust these numbers. E63 4.9 0-60, was my 3 year old driving it? All other magazines show it almost identical with the M5. And how could the CLS with the same engine and weight be faster?
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 05:56 PM   #11
sle39lvr
Lieutenant
22
Rep
562
Posts

Drives: 08 328i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: United States

iTrader: (3)

My biggest surprise is M5 having 52/48 weight distribution and that Jag having the same.

I thought the M5 supposed to have even better weight distribution than the regular 5-Series since the engine is shorter, mounted lower and towards the back. I didn't expect anything less that 50/50 on it.

That Jaguar, I always expected it to have FWD like balance thinking it's way more front-heavy, guess not!!
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 06:09 PM   #12
BlackJetE90
Brigadier General
225
Rep
3,307
Posts

Drives: E90 no longer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: is everything

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mako View Post
I would trust these numbers. E63 4.9 0-60, was my 3 year old driving it? All other magazines show it almost identical with the M5. And how could the CLS with the same engine and weight be faster?
It says in the article the CLS63 was putting down better than expected numbers, even though Benz said it didn't have the perf pack. The E63 also did not have the perf pack, as you can see from their dyno runs. I agree that most mags have the new M5 and E63 being almost identical in speed, maybe the E63 having a little more top end.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 06:14 PM   #13
BlackJetE90
Brigadier General
225
Rep
3,307
Posts

Drives: E90 no longer
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: is everything

iTrader: (0)

Here is the CLS63 comparo they refer to a couple times in the article.



Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 06:26 PM   #14
Chipped B6
Favorite ride of all time?: Blondes.
Chipped B6's Avatar
United_States
61
Rep
1,132
Posts

Drives: Boooooost!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Far away

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 228i Coupe  [0.00]
2013 ActiveHybrid 3  [0.00]
2014 M5  [2.00]
2011 Z4 35is  [4.80]
2011 M3 Coupe  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by grimlock View Post
A low-Dyno on a BMW -that's a rarity!
But this is a British mag right?

But the car got a crazy 0-100kmh, 4.32s without launch control. It was 0.65s faster than the E63. And the E63 was showing higher dyno figures (relative to stated) -go figure.

The larger displacement of the E63 cries out for an output boost /tune. Seems more precarious with the M5, you would want to keep it stock, BMW has wrung out a lot performance from the engine already.
That's quite wrong. Any motor from the factory with 552hp is built to last. If it was on it's last legs, it wouldn't have 552 hp. In fact, tuners of the same motor in the X5M and X6M are extracting another 100hp in just a tune alone.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 07:47 PM   #15
Beemw1M
Private First Class
Beemw1M's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
102
Posts

Drives: 14 335 MPPK
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N. California

iTrader: (0)

Jaguar ?? Has haaa Lol
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 07:49 PM   #16
HMtheJJ
Banned
Canada
0
Rep
43
Posts

Drives: B3s, Ranger Rover Sport, S550
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver

iTrader: (0)

ARE THEY BLIND?

Jaguar is among the ugliest cars with the cheapest looking cabins you can find nowadays. try to open that door on that Jag, oh yeah, sounds like a piece of cheap plastic about to fall off

Jaguar has never been and certainly not on the same level as far as quality, design concerned, but it'll compete comfortably with 2nd tier "luxury" cars like Infiniti and Acura, it doesn't deserve a spot where Benz, BMW, Audi and Lexus are at.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 08:19 PM   #17
antzcrashing
Major
antzcrashing's Avatar
36
Rep
1,205
Posts

Drives: 2006 330i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston MA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2006 BMW 330i  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by HMtheJJ View Post
ARE THEY BLIND?

Jaguar is among the ugliest cars with the cheapest looking cabins you can find nowadays. try to open that door on that Jag, oh yeah, sounds like a piece of cheap plastic about to fall off

Jaguar has never been and certainly not on the same level as far as quality, design concerned, but it'll compete comfortably with 2nd tier "luxury" cars like Infiniti and Acura, it doesn't deserve a spot where Benz, BMW, Audi and Lexus are at.
and Lexus... you had a point until you mentioned lexus - jaguar is more sporty than Lexus at least.

But anyway I think the article shows Jag has come a long way. Looks and feel are subjective so I am ok with Jaguar taking the trophy there.

Mercedes AMG does not have LSD standard, WOW. Mercedes really sucks, I thought it was bad LSD was not an option on the 3 series, at least all M's have it (at least for now....)
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 08:22 PM   #18
GOLFFRR
GOLFFRR's Avatar
1108
Rep
19,620
Posts

Drives: Golf Cart
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Solvang, CA/Camarillo, CA

iTrader: (4)

thanks for posting this up
__________________

BEFORE YOU BUY YOUR NEXT BMW, PM ME FIRST WE CAN HOOK YOU UP!
David Aviles: bmwdavid@icloud.com - Cell:202-262-2900
If you have any issues getting a hold of David PLEASE PM me, I'm available everyday till 645pm!
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 10:24 PM   #19
mainly
Lieutenant
Canada
10
Rep
519
Posts

Drives: 991 GT3, CLS63(coming) M5-sold
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Edmonton alberta, canada.

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackJetE90 View Post
Here is the CLS63 comparo they refer to a couple times in the article.




it couldnt have been this one, the times are different..

here they're around 2:00 minutes, and in the above mentioned they are around 1:24 with the cls being the fastest.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 10:24 PM   #20
Reckamech
Master of Disaster
Reckamech's Avatar
United_States
4
Rep
126
Posts

Drives: GLI Jetta (4 now) & Merc R350
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas,TX

iTrader: (0)

Send a message via MSN to Reckamech
Quote:
Originally Posted by sle39lvr
My biggest surprise is M5 having 52/48 weight distribution and that Jag having the same.

I thought the M5 supposed to have even better weight distribution than the regular 5-Series since the engine is shorter, mounted lower and towards the back. I didn't expect anything less that 50/50 on it.

That Jaguar, I always expected it to have FWD like balance thinking it's way more front-heavy, guess not!!
that changes when you calculate fuel in the tank.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 10:57 PM   #21
RoterDrache
New Member
Canada
0
Rep
5
Posts

Drives: F10 M5
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Standardized Testing

I wish that we had standardized testing for things like ride quality. It seems so subjective like peoples rating of food and wine. Why can't cars be tested on a single road test course and a computer monitor car movement to give a standardized measure of ride quality. The same could be done for steering effort and body roll. I think that would be more useful in trying to get a feel for car that you have not driven yet. Does something like this exist? I have driven the Jag and the Merc and did not come away with the same impression. So had I not experienced the cars myself I may have bought a Jag based on this review!
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2012, 11:07 PM   #22
silentassasin
You wont see me coming....
silentassasin's Avatar
United_States
16
Rep
1,298
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW 535 M-Sport
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (0)

I love reading these reviews. It takes me back to the E39 M5.
__________________


White on Black F10 M Sport
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2012 bmw m5, 2012 m5 forum, 2012 m5 review, 2013 bmw m5, 2013 m5, 2013 m5 forum, 2013 m5 review, bmw f10 m5, bmw m forum, bmw m forums, bmw m5 f10, bmw m5 forum, bmw m5 forums, bmw m5 review, f10 m5, f10 m5 forum, f10 m5 review, f10 m5 specs, m forum, m forums, m5 f10, m5 f10 forum, m5 f10 forums, m5 f10 review, m5 forum, m5 forums

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.




m5post
m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST