|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02-09-2014, 08:49 PM | #23 | |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Performance per dollar is a single metric. For some people, it's the most important metric. For other people, there are other factors that are more important. The Corvette has been outperforming cars at twice the price for a long time, yet people still buy Porsches and Ferraris all the time. The point of the i8 is to build a performance car that gets 94 MPG. Obviously it's not a matter of economy (money saving), but instead, a matter of making a point. Consuming less fuel, but still having a car that is great fun to drive. That's the point of the i8, and there are people with checkbooks and the motivation to buy them.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 04:55 AM | #25 | |
General
18706
Rep 19,443
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-10-2014, 08:20 AM | #26 | |
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Think of the balance between high-efficiency and high-performance. Most people treat this as a zero sum game: if you add efficiency, you must take away performance. The i8 is out to disprove that axiom. That is to say, you can have high-efficiency and high-performance. That is the point. What you've expressed is skepticism. You've said, "I see a lot of hype here, and I'm not sure if BMW can actually deliver." Whether or not that holds true will depend on what your expectations are. If you expect Corvette level performance, then BMW will have failed. It is BMW's job to manage consumers' expectations through their marketing of the product. So far, the advertising hasn't focused too much on the performance aspect, so I think that's a smart move. I'm not sure they're doing enough to explain "the point" of the car though. They're only building excitement. That's a tough balance when it comes to advertising, because ads that "educate" are usually poorly received. Humans respond most reliably to emotional impetus, so the advertisements are naturally focused on that approach. Confusing some consumers is an acceptable if it gets more people in to dealerships. That's one of the ugly warts of advertising. Let's get this out there: I don't think the i8 is going to deliver Corvette, Ferrari, or Porsche level performance. However -- and I'm repeating myself a bit here --I don't think that's the point. Back to the zero sum notion. If we think of a Ferrari 458 as 95% performance and 5% efficiency (hey, it's got decent CO₂ emissions!), you get 100% total performance. With the i8, BMW is trying to achieve 70% performance and 70% efficiency for a total of 140% performance. I think your skepticism is warranted. BMW hasn't proven this idea that they we can have our cake and eat it too. With the exception of the new Porsche 918, no manufacturer has delivered on this promise yet. Many of them are trying though. We're seeing more focus on efficiency, even in ultra-high-performance cars. Skepticism is important. It keeps BMW honest and will push them to deliver a better product. I'd encourage skepticism, but I hope you won't miss the point. It's difficult to be an effective skeptic if you don't understand the idea you're evaluating.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2014, 06:32 AM | #27 | |
General
18706
Rep 19,443
Posts |
Quote:
•First combination of BMW TwinPower Turbo and BMW eDrive technology plus intelligent energy management produce system output of 266 kW/362 hp (max. torque: 570 Nm / 420 lb-ft) and give the BMW i8 the performance characteristics of a pure-bred sports car (0 – 100 km/h / 62 mph in 4.4 seconds) combined with fuel economy and emissions comparable to a small car - EU fuel consumption: 2.5 litres per 100 km / 94 mpg (US); “glued-to-the-road” AWD driving experience with torque distribution geared towards optimized dynamics. •Driving Experience Control switch and eDrive button allow driver to choose from five driving modes; range of up to 35 kilometers (22 miles) on electric power alone and a top speed of 120 km/h (75 mph); COMFORT mode offers optimum balance between dynamics and efficiency; combined range in everyday conditions: over 500 kilometers (310 miles); SPORT mode with ultra-intense boost function provided by the electric motor; ECO PRO mode can be used in both all-electric mode and hybrid mode. •Sophisticated chassis technology featuring a double-wishbone front axle and a five-link rear axle; Electric Power Steering; Dynamic Damper Control comes as standard; 20-inch light-alloy wheels are standard. •Emotion-led visual impression based around established BMW i design language; classical sports car proportions and fresh interpretation of BMW design features; doors open upwards like wings; clean lines, plus surface design (external and internal) based on the layering principle; full-LED headlights as standard, innovative laser headlights – unique worldwide – available as an option where regulations allow. All these words tell me the i8 is targeted as a high-performance sports car, which the Corvette is too, and has many of the same features: dynamic damper control, sports-oriented suspension design, five (5) driving modes, use of aluminum and carbon fiber in construction (yeah I get it, the i8 has a carbon fiber passenger cell). The all-new C7 Corvette gets the job done (with better performance) and at a substantially far less price. It's admirable BMW is advancing the art, but sometimes the direction is not the right track. If BMW came out with a turbo 3-cylinder ceramic-engine with 300HP and 350 ft.lb. torque and ran at 95% efficiency (i.e. 5% heat loss), that would be impressive, even at $136,000. Let's call the i8 what it is, an engineering exercise, put into limited production. I remember when BMW introduced the limited-production Z1 (about 6 years after GM put the Fiero into production) and touted it as the next age in car design and manufacturing (space-frame covered by plastic panels). BMW built a few hundred copies of the Z1. GM built tens of thousands of price-competitive Fieros, built other vehicle designs using the technology, and even started a new car company (Saturn) based of the space-frame/plastic body construction technique. Automobile Magazine just claimed the i8 has the design of the year and what regular cars will be like (regardless of price) in 2064; let's hope it holds true. All the i8 does is trade the cost of fuel for the cost of technology, and to me doesn't do that good of a job at it. The Tesla Model S does do a great job at trading the cost of fuel for the cost of technology. The Tesla S is very close to providing the same over all cost of ownership for an EV as compared to a ICE-powered automobile in it's price and size class (how the price is subsidized is a matter of conjecture, but they are selling quite well and the consumer understands the purpose of it). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2014, 07:30 AM | #29 |
General
18706
Rep 19,443
Posts |
Okay, it's been under consideration for a few months already. But, you heard wrong, the free toupee was for the first 100 Z8 buyers who returned their car with cracked aluminum strut towers a few years back. LOL
Last edited by Efthreeoh; 02-11-2014 at 07:37 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2014, 08:28 AM | #30 | |
Brigadier General
195
Rep 3,780
Posts |
Quote:
I find this car lines up more with a Tesla than it does a Corvette, you are looking for the wrong benchmarks.
__________________
'98 Dinan/RMS stage 2+(VAC cams, CES Cutring etc) '15 Buick Regal "T"(wife) '06 Saab 9-5 Combi 5mt (full suspension, LSD, clipped turbo etc) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-11-2014, 08:37 AM | #31 | ||||
TIM YOYO
1506
Rep 3,282
Posts
Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
|
Quote:
Not once has BMW has compared the i8 to the Corvette. They wouldn't, because the Corvette includes zero advanced eco-related technology, and is in an entirely different league from a performance standpoint. It's a daft comparison, and you're not proving anything by continuing to harp on it. The Corvette's performance is in super-car territory. It is at the opposite end of the spectrum from the i8's target performance. Quote:
If you are looking for performance-per-dollar, then you shouldn't even consider the i8. Go ahead and toss all your brochures in the trash. Delete any bookmarks from your web browser. Unsubscribe from this thread. Go outside, have a breath of fresh air, and forget you ever saw the car. You should probably also consider that your wife's first-impiressions from a single commercial might not be the best basis from which to start the reasoning for your next car purchase. Quote:
Quote:
BMW is claiming to push the envelope, but as you pointed out, Tesla is kicking everyone's ass. By including an ICE, BMW is making a different bet. I've often wondered the same thing about the i8: "Does the inclusion of an ICE even make sense?" I have a feeling we're in agreement that the inclusion of an ICE is a misstep here. I think Tesla have it right. If you're going electric, go electric. Although, the Porsche 918 is an excellent demonstration of the benefits of a supplementary ICE can provide at the very top end. Maybe BMW followed Porshe's lead here? Seems plausible considering their market position. For me, the most exciting thing to come out of the i program is the CFRP technology. Rumors are that the an all-new Z-car will use a carbon fiber tub chassis. I'm sure that rumor is based on a whole lot of unproven hypotheses, but if it comes to fruition, the i program will have been more beneficial to BMW's core mission than the Z1 was. Similar rumors are circulating regarding the M2, although that car won't use a CF tub, just lots of CFRP. Reportedly, more than the M3/4 even.
__________________
His: 2019 R1250GS - Black
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech Past: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
02-12-2014, 05:25 AM | #32 | |
General
18706
Rep 19,443
Posts |
Quote:
Good discussion. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|